luvv to helpDiscover the Best Free Online Tools
Topic 5 of 8

Clustering Image Collections

Learn Clustering Image Collections for free with explanations, exercises, and a quick test (for Computer Vision Engineer).

Published: January 5, 2026 | Updated: January 5, 2026

Why this matters

Clustering image collections turns raw embeddings into meaningful groups without labels. As a Computer Vision Engineer, you will use clustering to:

  • Deduplicate and group near-identical products or shots, reducing catalog noise.
  • Create semi-automatic labels from clusters to accelerate supervised training.
  • Discover structure in large datasets (e.g., scenes, styles, species) for analytics.
  • Build retrieval experiences: cluster centers as anchors for browsing or search.
  • Clean datasets by flagging outliers and mislabeled items.

Concept explained simply

Each image is turned into a vector (embedding) by a vision model. Images that look alike have vectors that point in similar directions and are close by under a distance metric (often cosine or Euclidean). Clustering groups these vectors so each group represents a visual concept or identity.

Mental model

Imagine a star map. Each image is a star. Constellations are clusters: stars close to one another form a recognizable shape. You can find constellations by measuring distances and grouping stars that are close. Some stars are alone (outliers) and should not be forced into a constellation.

Practical workflow

  1. Get embeddings: Use a consistent vision model (e.g., generic image model or task-specific model like a face encoder). Keep model and preprocessing fixed.
  2. Normalize: L2-normalize embeddings so length is 1. This stabilizes cosine distance and many algorithms.
  3. Reduce dimensions (optional but helpful): PCA to 50–256 dims removes noise and speeds clustering. Keep variance around 90–95% as a starting point.
  4. Choose a distance: Cosine for normalized embeddings; Euclidean is fine too. Be consistent across steps.
  5. Select an algorithm: Pick based on data shape, noise, and whether you know K (the number of clusters).
  6. Tune & run: Adjust parameters (e.g., K for k-means, eps/min_samples for DBSCAN, min_cluster_size for HDBSCAN).
  7. Evaluate: Internal metrics (silhouette, Davies–Bouldin) + manual inspection samples. Iterate.
  8. Use outputs: Save cluster labels, medoids/centroids, and outlier lists for downstream tasks.

Choosing an algorithm

K-Means (and Spherical K-Means)
  • Use when: Clusters are roughly spherical, sizes similar, you can guess K.
  • Notes: Works well on L2-normalized embeddings with cosine/spherical variant. Needs K.
  • Key params: K, init restarts (increase for stability), max iterations.
  • Pitfalls: Sensitive to outliers and imbalanced clusters.
Agglomerative (Hierarchical) Clustering
  • Use when: You want a hierarchy or do not assume spherical clusters.
  • Notes: Linkages: average/complete (cosine-friendly), ward (Euclidean only).
  • Key params: Linkage type, distance threshold or number of clusters.
  • Pitfalls: Can be slower on very large datasets; choose fast distance computations.
DBSCAN
  • Use when: You want to find clusters of varying shape and mark noise automatically; K is unknown.
  • Key params: eps (neighborhood radius), min_samples (density requirement).
  • Tuning tip: Plot k-distance curve to pick eps at the knee; start with min_samples around dimensionality.
  • Pitfalls: Single global eps can be hard to set for datasets with varying densities.
HDBSCAN
  • Use when: You need DBSCAN-like noise handling but with varying densities.
  • Key params: min_cluster_size (smallest group you care about), min_samples (robustness).
  • Output: Cluster labels + probabilities; some points become -1 (noise).
Spectral Clustering
  • Use when: Non-convex clusters and smaller datasets where building a similarity graph is feasible.
  • Notes: Requires choosing K and building a similarity matrix; can be expensive for large N.

Preprocessing and distance choices

  • L2-normalize embeddings: Makes cosine distance meaningful; often improves stability.
  • Dimensionality reduction: PCA to 50–256 dims reduces noise; keep a small validation set to ensure separability is preserved.
  • Metric: Cosine distance is common for normalized embeddings; Euclidean often works similarly post-normalization.
  • Whitening (optional): Helpful if some dimensions dominate; validate with a small metric check before/after.

Worked examples

Example 1: Retail catalog dedup and variants

Goal: Group near-duplicates and color variants of the same product.

  • Embeddings: 2048-D image encoder, L2-normalized.
  • Reduce: PCA to 128 dims.
  • Algorithm: Spherical k-means with cosine distance.
  • Choosing K: Try K in {100, 150, 200}; pick the best silhouette and check 30 random clusters manually.

Outcome: K=150 had the best mix of compactness and interpretable groups. Outliers were flagged by high distance to centroids; reviewed manually for data cleaning.

Example 2: Wildlife camera traps (many outliers)

Goal: Discover species and discard noise (empty frames, motion blur).

  • Embeddings: 512-D model, normalized; PCA to 64 dims.
  • Algorithm: HDBSCAN with min_cluster_size=15, min_samples=5.
  • Evaluation: 50 sampled images per cluster for visual consistency; track % noise points.

Outcome: Clear species groups emerged; 22% points labeled noise—useful for automatic filtering.

Example 3: Grouping event photos by person (face clustering)

Goal: Group photos of the same person.

  • Embeddings: 128-D face embeddings; L2-normalized.
  • Algorithm: Agglomerative (average linkage) with cosine distance; cut tree by distance threshold (e.g., 0.35–0.45).
  • Validation: Pairwise precision/recall on a small labeled subset.

Outcome: Good identity clusters; a conservative threshold improved precision and avoided merges of look-alikes.

Evaluating clusters

  • Internal metrics: Silhouette score (closer to 1 is better), Davies–Bouldin (lower is better), Calinski–Harabasz (higher is better).
  • Practical checks:
    • Sample 20–50 images from several clusters; verify a coherent theme or identity.
    • Check cluster size distribution; extremely large clusters can hide merges, many singletons can mean over-segmentation.
    • Inspect top-k nearest neighbors to cluster centroids/medoids; look for off-topic items.
  • Human-in-the-loop: Let users merge/split clusters and accept/reject outliers; feed corrections back into your process.

Practical tips

  • Standardize pipeline: same model, preprocessing, and normalization across all images.
  • Batch effects: If images come from different sources, check for source-driven clusters; mitigate with normalization or domain adaptation.
  • Speed: Use PCA and mini-batch variants (where available). For very large N, cluster a sample, then assign the rest to nearest centroids.
  • Imbalanced data: Prefer HDBSCAN or agglomerative when small/large clusters coexist; k-means may over-merge small groups.
  • Threshold-based assignment: For identity tasks, use a max distance to centroid/medoid; leave far points unassigned.

Exercises (hands-on)

Work through these. A quick test is available to everyone; only logged-in users have their progress saved.

Exercise 1: Pick K from silhouette scores

You clustered the same embeddings with different K and got:

  • K=2 → silhouette=0.41
  • K=3 → silhouette=0.52
  • K=4 → silhouette=0.47

Choose the best K and explain why. Then list two follow-up checks you would do before finalizing.

Exercise 2: Many outliers, uneven clusters

Dataset: 10,000 images, normalized 512-D embeddings. Expect many singletons and a few medium groups. Propose a clustering approach (algorithm + key parameters) that handles noise gracefully, and describe how you will evaluate the result.

Self-check checklist
  • Did you justify the metric (cosine vs Euclidean) consistently with normalization?
  • Did you propose at least one internal metric for evaluation?
  • Did you plan a manual inspection sample?
  • Did you address outliers/noise explicitly?

Common mistakes and how to self-check

  • Skipping normalization: Self-check: compute average vector norm; if not ~1, L2-normalize and re-run.
  • Using Euclidean on unnormalized embeddings: Self-check: compare cosine vs Euclidean silhouette; pick the better one after normalization.
  • Forcing K when K is unknown: Self-check: try density-based methods; compare cluster size histograms.
  • Ignoring outliers: Self-check: measure % of points far from centroids; review samples.
  • No manual validation: Self-check: visually inspect at least 20 clusters; flag inconsistent ones.
  • Over-reducing dimensions: Self-check: after PCA, verify that nearest neighbors remain mostly unchanged on a validation subset.

Who this is for

  • Computer Vision Engineers organizing large unlabeled image sets.
  • ML practitioners building retrieval, deduplication, or semi-supervised pipelines.

Prerequisites

  • Basic understanding of embeddings and distance metrics.
  • Ability to run inference to compute image embeddings.
  • Familiarity with at least one clustering algorithm.

Learning path

  1. Compute and normalize embeddings for a small image set (500–2,000 images).
  2. Run PCA and compare clustering metrics before/after.
  3. Try k-means vs HDBSCAN; compare cluster size distributions and manual samples.
  4. Design a simple UI (even a notebook grid) to view cluster thumbnails and annotate merges/splits.

Practical projects

  • Visual Deduplicator: Cluster product images, mark clusters with near-duplicate pairs, export a CSV of suggested merges.
  • Species Discovery: Cluster wildlife photos, tag noise, and create a shortlist of candidate species clusters for expert review.
  • Event Photo Grouper: Cluster faces by identity with a distance threshold; build a small viewer to browse groups.

Next steps

  • Integrate clustering into your data curation workflow (cleaning, dedup, semi-labeling).
  • Track metrics over time as new images arrive; schedule periodic re-clustering or incremental assignment.
  • Connect cluster labels to downstream training to boost supervised models.

Mini challenge

You have 50,000 normalized embeddings with mixed densities. Design a three-pass pipeline that first removes extreme outliers, then finds stable cores, then assigns leftovers to the nearest cluster if within a threshold. Write the steps and key parameters you would start with.

Practice Exercises

2 exercises to complete

Instructions

You clustered the same embeddings with K in {2, 3, 4} and got silhouette scores 0.41, 0.52, and 0.47 respectively. Choose the best K and explain why. Then list two follow-up checks before finalizing.

Expected Output
K=3 chosen, with rationale and two follow-up validation steps.

Clustering Image Collections — Quick Test

Test your knowledge with 7 questions. Pass with 70% or higher.

7 questions70% to pass

Have questions about Clustering Image Collections?

AI Assistant

Ask questions about this tool