luvv to helpDiscover the Best Free Online Tools

Training And Optimization

Learn Training And Optimization for Computer Vision Engineer for free: roadmap, examples, subskills, and a skill exam.

Published: January 5, 2026 | Updated: January 5, 2026

Why Training and Optimization matters for Computer Vision Engineers

Training and optimization turn a model architecture into a reliable, fast, and generalizable solution. For Computer Vision Engineers, this skill unlocks: faster model iteration, higher accuracy on challenging datasets, stable multi-GPU training, and the ability to reproduce and explain results for production.

  • Ship models that meet latency/accuracy targets.
  • Handle class imbalance typical in detection/segmentation.
  • Scale to multi-GPU without losing correctness.
  • Track experiments and reproduce wins on demand.

What you’ll learn

  • Choose and implement the right loss for classification, detection, and segmentation.
  • Tune hyperparameters efficiently with small budgets.
  • Train with mixed precision and distributed setups safely.
  • Build efficient data pipelines and control overfitting.
  • Track experiments, seed runs, and reproduce results.

Who this is for

  • Engineers building CV systems (classification, detection, segmentation).
  • Data scientists moving from notebooks to production-grade training.
  • Researchers who need consistent, comparable experiments.

Prerequisites

  • Python and PyTorch basics (tensors, nn.Module, DataLoader).
  • Familiarity with at least one CV task (e.g., image classification).
  • Comfort using a GPU environment (CUDA awareness helps).

Learning path

  1. Milestone 1: Loss functions for vision
    Understand cross-entropy, BCEWithLogits, SmoothL1, IoU/Dice; add label smoothing.
  2. Milestone 2: Handle imbalance
    Use Focal Loss and class weighting; verify per-class metrics.
  3. Milestone 3: Hyperparameter tuning
    Design small search spaces; run random search; adopt LR scheduling.
  4. Milestone 4: Mixed precision
    Use autocast + GradScaler; test stability and speed.
  5. Milestone 5: Distributed training
    DDP with DistributedSampler; ensure correct seeding and evaluation.
  6. Milestone 6: Data loading + regularization
    Optimize DataLoader; use augmentation, weight decay, early stopping.
  7. Milestone 7: Tracking + reproducibility
    Seed everything, log configs/metrics, save/resume checkpoints consistently.

Worked examples

1) Classification with label smoothing, weight decay, and early stopping (PyTorch)
import torch, torch.nn as nn, torch.optim as optim
from torchvision import models

model = models.resnet18(num_classes=10)
criterion = nn.CrossEntropyLoss(label_smoothing=0.1)
optimizer = optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=3e-4, weight_decay=1e-4)
scheduler = optim.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=20)

best_val = float('inf')
patience, bad_epochs = 5, 0

for epoch in range(50):
    model.train()
    for x, y in train_loader:
        optimizer.zero_grad()
        logits = model(x)
        loss = criterion(logits, y)
        loss.backward()
        optimizer.step()
    scheduler.step()

    # validate
    model.eval()
    val_loss = 0.0
    with torch.no_grad():
        for x, y in val_loader:
            val_loss += criterion(model(x), y).item()
    val_loss /= len(val_loader)

    if val_loss < best_val:
        best_val = val_loss
        bad_epochs = 0
        torch.save({'model': model.state_dict()}, 'best.pt')
    else:
        bad_epochs += 1
        if bad_epochs >= patience:
            print('Early stopping')
            break

Why it works: label smoothing reduces overconfidence; AdamW with weight decay improves generalization; early stopping prevents overfitting.

2) Implement Focal Loss for multi-class imbalance
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F

class FocalLoss(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, gamma=2.0, alpha=None, reduction='mean'):
        super().__init__()
        self.gamma = gamma
        self.alpha = alpha  # tensor of shape [C] or scalar or None
        self.reduction = reduction

    def forward(self, logits, target):
        # logits: [N, C], target: [N]
        logp = F.log_softmax(logits, dim=1)
        p = logp.exp()
        pt = p.gather(1, target.unsqueeze(1)).squeeze(1)  # [N]
        logpt = logp.gather(1, target.unsqueeze(1)).squeeze(1)
        focal = (1 - pt).pow(self.gamma) * (-logpt)
        if self.alpha is not None:
            if isinstance(self.alpha, torch.Tensor):
                at = self.alpha.to(logits.device).gather(0, target)
            else:
                at = torch.full_like(pt, float(self.alpha))
            focal = at * focal
        if self.reduction == 'mean':
            return focal.mean()
        if self.reduction == 'sum':
            return focal.sum()
        return focal

Tip: Inspect per-class recall before and after. Focal Loss should help rare classes by emphasizing hard examples.

3) Mixed precision training (autocast + GradScaler)
import torch
from torch.cuda.amp import autocast, GradScaler

scaler = GradScaler()
model = model.cuda()

for epoch in range(10):
    model.train()
    for x, y in train_loader:
        x, y = x.cuda(non_blocking=True), y.cuda(non_blocking=True)
        optimizer.zero_grad(set_to_none=True)
        with autocast():
            logits = model(x)
            loss = criterion(logits, y)
        scaler.scale(loss).backward()
        scaler.step(optimizer)
        scaler.update()

Benefits: faster training and lower memory with minimal code changes. If you see inf/NaN, try lower LR or disable AMP for numerically unstable ops.

4) Single-node DistributedDataParallel (DDP) essentials
# Launched via: torchrun --nproc_per_node=2 train.py
import os, torch, torch.distributed as dist
from torch.nn.parallel import DistributedDataParallel as DDP
from torch.utils.data import DistributedSampler

rank = int(os.environ['RANK'])
local_rank = int(os.environ['LOCAL_RANK'])
world_size = int(os.environ['WORLD_SIZE'])

dist.init_process_group('nccl')
torch.cuda.set_device(local_rank)

model = model.cuda(local_rank)
model = DDP(model, device_ids=[local_rank])

sampler = DistributedSampler(train_dataset, num_replicas=world_size, rank=rank, shuffle=True)
loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(train_dataset, batch_size=64, sampler=sampler, num_workers=4, pin_memory=True, persistent_workers=True)

for epoch in range(20):
    sampler.set_epoch(epoch)
    for x, y in loader:
        x, y = x.cuda(non_blocking=True), y.cuda(non_blocking=True)
        optimizer.zero_grad(set_to_none=True)
        loss = criterion(model(x), y)
        loss.backward()
        optimizer.step()

dist.destroy_process_group()

Critical points: use DistributedSampler, call sampler.set_epoch each epoch, pin each process to its GPU, and avoid non-deterministic shuffles across ranks.

5) Efficient DataLoader tuning
from torchvision import transforms

transform = transforms.Compose([
    transforms.RandomResizedCrop(224),
    transforms.RandomHorizontalFlip(),
    transforms.ToTensor()
])

loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(
    train_dataset,
    batch_size=128,
    shuffle=True,
    num_workers=4,
    pin_memory=True,
    prefetch_factor=2,
    persistent_workers=True
)

# Quick throughput probe (warm up then measure a few batches)
import time
it = iter(loader)
for _ in range(5): next(it)  # warmup
start = time.time()
for _ in range(20):
    batch = next(it)
end = time.time()
print('~batches/sec:', 20/(end-start))

Try varying batch size, num_workers, and prefetch_factor. On GPUs, pin_memory often improves throughput.

6) Simple random search for LR and weight decay
import random
search = []
for _ in range(8):
    lr = 10 ** random.uniform(-5, -3)
    wd = 10 ** random.uniform(-6, -2)
    search.append({'lr': lr, 'wd': wd})

results = []
for cfg in search:
    model = make_model()
    opt = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=cfg['lr'], weight_decay=cfg['wd'])
    val = train_for_few_epochs(model, opt, train_loader, val_loader, max_epochs=5)  # small budget
    results.append((cfg, val['acc']))

best = max(results, key=lambda x: x[1])
print('Best config:', best[0], 'Val acc:', best[1])

Random search explores more unique values with the same budget than grid search and often finds better configs quickly.

Mini tasks

  • Swap CrossEntropyLoss for Focal Loss on an imbalanced classifier and compare per-class recall.
  • Enable mixed precision and report speedup and max batch size difference.
  • Increase DataLoader num_workers stepwise (0, 2, 4, 8) and record batches/sec.
  • Run a small random search over LR and weight decay using only 10% of data.
  • If you have 2+ GPUs, run the same training with DDP and confirm identical validation metrics across runs.

Drills / exercises

  • Implement label smoothing both via CrossEntropyLoss and manually with soft labels; verify equivalence.
  • Create a training loop with early stopping and best-checkpoint saving.
  • Add cosine LR schedule with warmup and compare convergence to fixed LR.
  • Log metrics to a JSONL file (one JSON per line) and include hyperparameters in every record.
  • Write a reproducibility helper that sets seeds and configures deterministic backends.

Common mistakes and debugging tips

  • Validating in train mode: always use model.eval() and torch.no_grad() for validation.
  • Imbalance ignored: overall accuracy looks fine but minority recall is near zero; inspect per-class metrics.
  • DDP shuffling errors: forgetting sampler.set_epoch(epoch) causes repeated batches and poor generalization.
  • Unstable AMP: loss becomes NaN; reduce LR, disable AMP for specific ops, or clamp gradients.
  • Data bottlenecks: GPU idle while CPU loads data; raise num_workers, enable pin_memory, and simplify heavy augmentations.
  • Over-regularization: too much weight decay/dropout leads to underfitting; monitor train vs val gap.
Quick debugging checklist
  • Sanity check: overfit a tiny subset (e.g., 512 samples). If it can’t, there’s a bug in data/labels/model.
  • Monitor gradient norms. Exploding? Lower LR, add gradient clipping.
  • Use a LR finder: sweep LR log-scale for a few hundred steps and pick the largest stable LR.
  • Print a few batch labels and predictions to verify order, shapes, and label mapping.

Mini project: Imbalanced defect classifier

Goal: Build a small image classifier where positive defects are rare.

  1. Dataset: create splits; inspect class distribution.
  2. Baseline: ResNet-18 with CrossEntropyLoss; compute per-class metrics.
  3. Imbalance handling: switch to Focal Loss or class weights; compare recall for the rare class.
  4. Regularization: try label smoothing and weight decay; add basic augmentation.
  5. Efficiency: enable mixed precision; tune DataLoader workers.
  6. Tuning: random search LR and weight decay on a 5-epoch budget; keep the best.
  7. Reproducibility: seed runs, log configs/metrics to JSONL, save best checkpoint.
Deliverables to verify
  • Training/validation curves with best checkpoint noted.
  • Per-class precision/recall before and after imbalance mitigation.
  • Throughput measurements (batches/sec) for data loading changes.
  • Config file or JSON record of best hyperparameters.

Subskills

  • Loss Functions For Vision Tasks — choose/implement CrossEntropy, BCEWithLogits, SmoothL1, IoU/Dice correctly for task type.
  • Class Imbalance Losses Focal Loss — mitigate imbalance via Focal Loss, class weights, or sampling strategies.
  • Hyperparameter Tuning Basics — design small yet effective search spaces; use random/grid search and LR schedules.
  • Mixed Precision Training — train with autocast + GradScaler safely and measure speed/accuracy.
  • Distributed Training Basics — run DDP with DistributedSampler and correct seeding.
  • Efficient Data Loaders — optimize workers, pin_memory, and prefetch to remove bottlenecks.
  • Regularization And Overfitting Control — apply weight decay, dropout, augmentation, and early stopping.
  • Experiment Tracking And Reproducibility — log configs/metrics, set seeds, save/resume checkpoints.

Next steps

  • Try the skill exam to check your understanding. Anyone can take it; logged-in users get saved progress.
  • Extend the mini project to detection or segmentation and re-apply the same optimization toolkit.
  • Prepare for deployment by learning quantization, pruning, and runtime profiling.

Training And Optimization — Skill Exam

This exam checks practical understanding of training and optimization for Computer Vision. You can take it for free. Anyone can attempt it; if you’re logged in, your progress and score are saved so you can resume later.Rules: closed-book, no time limit here; aim for thoughtful, evidence-based choices. Passing score is 70%.

12 questions70% to pass

Have questions about Training And Optimization?

AI Assistant

Ask questions about this tool