luvv to helpDiscover the Best Free Online Tools
Topic 10 of 10

Data Lineage And Documentation

Learn Data Lineage And Documentation for free with explanations, exercises, and a quick test (for Machine Learning Engineer).

Published: January 1, 2026 | Updated: January 1, 2026

Why this matters for Machine Learning Engineers

Models fail quietly when data changes loudly. Data lineage shows where data comes from, how it changes, and where it goes. Good documentation tells people how to use it safely. Together they enable:

  • Root-cause analysis when model metrics drop after a data change
  • Impact analysis before a schema or transformation change
  • Compliance proofs (PII removal, retention policies)
  • Reproducibility of training and consistent backfills
  • Onboarding and handoffs without tribal knowledge
Real tasks you will face
  • Trace which models used a corrupted vendor file last Tuesday and schedule a targeted backfill
  • Document a feature view so others understand null handling and units
  • Approve a schema change by assessing blast radius across downstream dashboards and models
  • Produce an audit trail for a model prediction impacting a customer decision

Concept explained simply

Data lineage is the map of your data’s journey: each stop (node) is a dataset or step, each arrow (edge) is a transformation. Documentation is the travel guide that explains rules, risks, and how to operate the route.

Mental model

Imagine a passport that gets stamped at every hop:

  • Source stamp: where data came from and when
  • Code stamp: which code/version transformed it
  • Check stamp: what validations passed or failed
  • Owner stamp: who is responsible
  • Downstream stamp: who depends on this output
What good lineage looks like
  • Automatic capture from your orchestrator and storage where possible
  • Human-readable summaries for transformations and assumptions
  • Versioned with your code and data contracts
  • Easily searchable by dataset, field, job, or time window

A minimal lineage + docs spec you can apply today

Record this for every pipeline output (table, feature view, model dataset):

  • Identity: dataset name, environment, owner, contact
  • Provenance: input datasets, job name, run id, run time window
  • Code: repo, commit/tag, job version, environment image
  • Schema: column list, types, units, nullable flags, schema hash
  • Transformation summary: key steps, filters, joins, aggregations
  • Quality checks: rules and latest results
  • PII & compliance: fields with sensitivity labels and policies
  • Downstream deps: jobs, models, dashboards consuming this dataset
  • Change log: what changed, when, why, and migration notes
Copy-ready templates
{
  "dataset": "features.user_churn_daily",
  "env": "prod",
  "owner": "ml-platform@company",
  "inputs": [
    "raw.users", "raw.events", "ref.exchange_rates"
  ],
  "job": {
    "name": "build_user_churn_features",
    "run_id": "2026-01-01T02:00Z",
    "window": "[2025-12-31, 2026-01-01)"
  },
  "code": {
    "repo": "git://company/ml-features",
    "commit": "a1b2c3d",
    "image": "features:py3.11-1.4"
  },
  "schema": {
    "hash": "sha256:...",
    "columns": [
      {"name": "user_id", "type": "string", "nullable": false},
      {"name": "sessions_7d", "type": "int", "nullable": false, "unit": "count"},
      {"name": "avg_session_minutes", "type": "float", "unit": "minutes"},
      {"name": "is_premium", "type": "bool"}
    ]
  },
  "transform_summary": "Events joined to users on user_id; 7-day window aggregations; timezone normalized to UTC; outliers winsorized at p99.",
  "quality": [
    {"rule": "null_rate(avg_session_minutes) < 0.05", "status": "pass"},
    {"rule": "sessions_7d >= 0", "status": "pass"}
  ],
  "pii": {"contains_pii": false, "notes": "user_id is hashed."},
  "downstream": ["model.user_churn_v3"],
  "changelog": [
    {"date": "2025-12-20", "change": "Added avg_session_minutes", "impact": "Non-breaking; nullable"}
  ]
}
Change log entry template
- Date:
- Change type: [schema | logic | schedule | infra]
- Description:
- Reason:
- Backward compatibility: [breaking | non-breaking]
- Migration/Backfill plan:
- Blast radius (downstreams affected):
- Owner + approval:

Worked examples

Example 1 — Churn features pipeline

Scenario: Build daily churn features from raw events and users, write to a feature store, train churn model weekly.

  • Lineage nodes: raw.events -> cleaned.events_utc -> features.user_churn_daily -> model.user_churn_v3
  • Key docs: timezone normalization; 7-day window; winsorization at p99; hashed user_id.
  • Why it matters: When p99 jumps due to bot traffic, lineage pinpoints cleaned.events_utc as the first drift point.
Example 2 — Currency conversion logic change

Scenario: You switch from daily close to hourly VWAP for USD conversion.

  • Lineage: ref.exchange_rates influences revenue features and LTV model data.
  • Action: Add change log, mark as breaking for outputs using revenue; run backfill for last 90 days; retrain affected models.
  • Outcome: Stakeholders accept small historical shifts because you provided an audit trail and validation results.
Example 3 — PII removal

Scenario: Remove email column; replace with hashed ID before feature generation.

  • Lineage shows PII stops at staging.users_pii; downstream tables contain only hashed IDs.
  • Docs include policy notes and verification checks for PII fields.
  • Compliance request is satisfied with a one-page export of lineage + checks.

Who this is for

  • Machine Learning Engineers building and maintaining feature pipelines
  • Data Engineers supporting ML training and inference data
  • Analysts who consume ML outputs and need trustable datasets

Prerequisites

  • Basic SQL and a data orchestration tool familiarity
  • Understanding of schemas, partitions, and job scheduling
  • Git basics for versioning

Learning path

  1. Capture minimal lineage fields for one existing pipeline
  2. Add quality checks and record their results
  3. Write a concise runbook and data dictionary
  4. Pilot a change log process for schema or logic changes
  5. Automate lineage capture from your orchestrator and storage

Exercises

Note: The quick test is available to everyone; only logged-in users will have saved progress.

Exercise 1 (ex1): Minimal lineage record

Pick a simple pipeline (one input, one output). Draft a lineage record that includes identity, provenance, code version, schema summary, transformation summary, checks, and owner. Keep it under 200 words.

Need a nudge?
  • Write dataset name and owner first
  • List inputs and time window
  • Capture repo and commit
  • Describe transformations in 1–2 sentences
  • List 2–3 quality rules with latest status

Exercise 2 (ex2): Change log + blast radius

A new column last_active_at (timestamp, nullable) is added to features.user_churn_daily. Write a change log entry and identify downstreams at risk. Propose a migration plan.

Need a nudge?
  • Mark change type (schema)
  • Assess if non-breaking for training; check inference joins
  • Describe test rollout and alerting

Exercise checklist

  • Lineage record has all minimal fields
  • Schema or logic changes are captured in change log
  • Backfill or migration plan is present where needed
  • Quality checks are specific and measurable

Common mistakes and how to self-check

  • Mistake: Only documenting tables, not transformations. Self-check: Does your summary list filters, joins, and aggregation levels?
  • Mistake: No code version in lineage. Self-check: Can you reproduce last Tuesday’s run with the same commit and image?
  • Mistake: Missing units and null semantics. Self-check: For every numeric column, is unit and null policy written?
  • Mistake: Treating change logs as optional. Self-check: Can someone reconstruct why a metric shifted on a specific date?
  • Mistake: Not tracking downstream consumers. Self-check: Before a breaking change, do you get a concrete list of affected jobs/models?
Quick self-audit (5 minutes)
  • Pick one dataset and verify owner, inputs, and code commit are recorded
  • Find a change in the past month; confirm a log entry exists
  • Open the latest quality check results; confirm pass/fail status is visible

Practical projects

  • Add minimal lineage to one production feature pipeline and export a one-page PDF report for stakeholders
  • Create a data dictionary for a core feature view, including units, null handling, and calculation rules
  • Design a change management workflow: change log file, review checklist, and notification template
  • Automate recording of run metadata (run id, window, commit) into table properties or a sidecar audit table

Mini challenge

Pick a model with degraded performance last month. Using lineage and change logs, find the earliest upstream change that could explain the drop. Draft a rollback or backfill plan in 5 bullet points.

Next steps

  • Roll out the minimal lineage spec across top 3 pipelines
  • Add automated collection from your scheduler and storage
  • Introduce service-level objectives (freshness, completeness) and alerting
  • Schedule a quarterly lineage audit and documentation refresh

Practice Exercises

2 exercises to complete

Instructions

Choose a simple pipeline with one input and one output. Produce a lineage record that includes: identity, provenance (inputs, run window), code (repo, commit), schema (columns or a short summary + hash/placeholder), transformation summary (1–2 sentences), quality checks (2–3 rules with pass/fail), owner, and downstreams. Keep it under 200 words.

Expected Output
A compact, structured lineage record capturing identity, provenance, code version, schema summary, transformation notes, checks, owner, and downstreams.

Data Lineage And Documentation — Quick Test

Test your knowledge with 8 questions. Pass with 70% or higher.

8 questions70% to pass

Have questions about Data Lineage And Documentation?

AI Assistant

Ask questions about this tool