How to learn Feature Definitions And Reuse for Feature Stores Concepts in Machine Learning Engineer for free

Why this matters

Clear, reusable feature definitions reduce duplicate work, prevent data leakage, and keep training and serving consistent. As a Machine Learning Engineer, you will:

Design canonical features once and reuse them across multiple models and teams.
Guarantee point-in-time correctness to avoid leakage.
Align offline training and online inference with the same definitions.
Version and evolve features without breaking downstream consumers.

Concept explained simply

A feature definition is a precise recipe for how to compute a feature. It includes its name, which entity it belongs to (like user_id or item_id), the time grain, source tables, transformations, freshness rules, and owners. Reuse means referencing the same, tested recipe across different models and pipelines rather than reinventing it.

Mental model

Think of each feature as a function:

(Entity, Event Time) → Value

If two models need the same function, they should call the same definition. If the function changes, you create a new version and keep the old one for backward compatibility.

Core elements of a good feature definition

Name: Stable, descriptive, with a consistent prefix (entity) and suffix (time window, units). Example: user_30d_txn_count.
Entity: The key the feature is computed for (user_id, card_id, item_id).
Granularity: One row per (entity, event_time) or per entity snapshot time.
Time semantics: Window size, lag, and the event_time column used.
Sources: Raw tables/streams and join keys.
Transform: Deterministic steps (aggregations, encodings) with null handling.
Freshness / TTL: How often it updates and when it expires.
Backfill: Historical recomputation rules.
Versioning: user_30d_txn_count:v1, v2 for breaking changes.
Ownership & description: Team, purpose, and contact.
Quality checks: Simple tests (value ranges, monotonicity, non-null rate).

Naming pattern examples

entity_window_metric_units: user_7d_avg_spend_usd
entity_pointin_time_lag_feature: item_t-1d_price_usd
entity_time_invariant_feature: merchant_category_code

Worked examples

Example 1: Churn features reused by marketing and support

Feature: user_30d_txn_count:v1
Entity: user_id
Time: 30-day rolling window ending at event_time; source event_time = transaction_timestamp
Sources: transactions(user_id, amount, transaction_timestamp)
Transform: COUNT(*) of transactions within [event_time-30d, event_time]
Freshness/TTL: recompute daily; TTL 36h
Nulls: if no transactions → 0
Owner: Growth Data

Reuse: The same feature is used in a churn model and a marketing propensity model. Only one definition is maintained.

Example 2: Fraud features across card and device entities

Feature: card_1h_txn_count:v1
Entity: card_id
Time: 1-hour rolling window
Sources: auth_logs(card_id, auth_time)
Transform: COUNT(*) in [event_time-1h, event_time]
Freshness: every 5 minutes; TTL 10m (for online fraud scoring)
Quality check: value spike guardrail (p99 over last day within 2x of prior day)
Owner: Risk ML

Reuse: The feature feeds the real-time fraud model and a nightly risk dashboard without redefining logic.

Example 3: Ranking features from clicks and impressions

Feature: item_30d_ctr:v2
Entity: item_id
Time: 30-day window using impression_time as event_time
Sources: impressions(item_id, impression_time, clicked)
Transform: SUM(clicked)/COUNT(*) over 30 days; add 1e-6 smoothing
Freshness: hourly; TTL 3h
Change from v1: switched to impression_time (fix leakage). v1 kept for legacy.
Owner: Recsys

Reuse: The CTR feature is used by both the recommendation ranker and an ads-quality model. Versioning allows migration without breaking old consumers.

How to define features well (step-by-step)

Choose the entity and event_time that reflect the prediction moment.
Write the transform declaratively (window, filters, aggregations) and include null handling.
Specify freshness, TTL, and backfill so both offline and online stores behave consistently.
Attach ownership, description, and tests for accountability and trust.
Version when breaking changes occur (new source, different time semantics, changed units).

Do and Don't examples

Do: user_7d_avg_spend_usd clearly states window and units.
Don't: avg_spend (ambiguous, not reusable across entities).
Do: define event_time column and window.
Don't: leave event_time implicit (risk of leakage).

Common mistakes and self-check

Leakage: using future information. Self-check: Can I compute this at prediction time using only past data?
Training-serving mismatch: different transforms offline vs. online. Self-check: Are both paths created from the same definition?
Ambiguous names/units. Self-check: Would a new teammate infer window, units, and entity from the name?
Missing owner/tests. Self-check: Is there a contact and at least one validation rule?
Wrong granularity. Self-check: Is there exactly one value per (entity, event_time) as intended?
Unbounded TTL. Self-check: Will stale values persist longer than allowed for decisions?

Exercises

Do these in a text editor or notebook. Keep definitions concise and precise.

Exercise 1 — Define reusable spend features

Goal: Create two features for user-level spend from a transactions table.

Data snapshot

transactions(user_id, amount_usd, transaction_timestamp)

Define:

user_30d_total_spend_usd
user_7d_txn_count

For each, include: entity, event_time, window, sources, transform, null handling, freshness, TTL, backfill, owner, version.

Checklist:
- Window and event_time clearly stated
- Transform unambiguous
- Freshness/TTL feasible for both offline and online
- Owner and version present

Exercise 2 — Plan feature reuse across models

You support three models: churn, LTV, and marketing propensity. Candidate features:

user_30d_total_spend_usd
user_7d_txn_count
user_country_code
user_first_purchase_age_days

Plan:

Which features become a shared user_activity bundle?
Which are static profile features?
How would you version if user_country_code source changes?

Checklist:
- No duplication across models
- Clear bundle boundaries (activity vs. profile)
- Versioning rule articulated

Mini challenge

Pick any feature you defined before. Propose a v2 change that improves quality (e.g., different window, better smoothing). Explain why it is breaking or non-breaking and how you would roll it out while keeping existing consumers stable.

Who this is for

Machine Learning Engineers and Data Scientists building production models.
Data Engineers supporting feature pipelines.

Prerequisites

Comfort with SQL aggregations and windowing.
Basic understanding of training-serving skew and data leakage.

Learning path

Before: Data sources and event_time fundamentals; point-in-time correctness.
Now: Feature definitions and reuse (this lesson).
Next: Materialization strategies, monitoring, and feature lifecycle management.

Practical projects

Project 1: Define a user_activity bundle with 3 rolling-window features and backfill one year of history.
Project 2: Create v2 of a feature with changed window; run an A/B evaluation while keeping v1 for legacy consumers.
Project 3: Write simple validation tests (range checks, non-null rate) that run during materialization.

Next steps

Adopt a naming convention across teams.
Add ownership and tests to your top 10 features.
Plan versioning for any upcoming breaking changes.

Quick Test

Take the quick test to check your understanding. Anyone can take it for free; saved progress is available to logged-in users.

Feature Definitions And Reuse

Table of Contents