luvv to helpDiscover the Best Free Online Tools
Topic 9 of 9

Incident Response For ML

Learn Incident Response For ML for free with explanations, exercises, and a quick test (for Machine Learning Engineer).

Published: January 1, 2026 | Updated: January 1, 2026

Why this matters

Machine learning systems fail in ways classic software doesn’t: data drift, degraded model quality, silent bias, broken features, and misbehaving online learners. A clear incident response plan reduces customer impact, protects revenue, and shortens recovery time.

  • Real tasks you will do: set up model SLOs, triage alerts, execute rollback, coordinate cross-team comms, run post-incident review, and add guardrails to prevent repeats.
  • Common stakes: incorrect predictions driving losses, unsafe outputs, compliance risk, and reputation damage.

Concept explained simply

Incident response for ML is a repeatable playbook you run when model behavior or the ML platform significantly deviates from expected performance or safety.

Mental model

  • Think “smoke alarms + fire drill” for models: monitors detect smoke, you triage the fire, contain spread, restore normal service, then fireproof the house.
  • Core loop: Detect → Triage → Contain → Recover → Verify → Learn.
What makes ML incidents special?
  • Quality can degrade silently (no crashes, just worse predictions).
  • Data-dependent failures (drift, upstream schema changes).
  • Ethical/safety incidents (bias spikes, toxic LLM outputs).
  • Coupled pipelines (feature store, retraining, deployment) increase blast radius.

Incident types, severities, and SLOs

Common ML incident types

  • Data/feature issues: missing features, wrong ranges, schema drift, staleness.
  • Model quality: accuracy drop, fairness regressions, concept drift.
  • Serving/platform: latency spikes, timeouts, resource exhaustion, autoscaling issues.
  • Training/ETL: failed jobs, corrupted artifacts, bad hyperparams pushed to prod.
  • Safety/abuse: adversarial inputs, prompt injection, toxic outputs, PII leakage.

Severity (suggested)

  • SEV1: Broad customer/business impact; unsafe or legally risky outputs.
  • SEV2: Noticeable impact on KPIs; partial degradation.
  • SEV3: Limited scope or early detection; workarounds exist.

ML SLO examples

  • Prediction SLOs: p95 latency ≤ target; availability ≥ target.
  • Quality SLOs: monitor proxy metrics (AUC, win rate, calibration error, PSI for drift) within thresholds.
  • Safety SLOs: toxic or unsafe response rate ≤ threshold.
Runbook essentials
  • Pager/ownership: who is on-call; escalation paths.
  • Decision table: when to rollback, fail open/closed, throttle, or switch to fallback model.
  • Checklists: triage steps, containment actions, verification steps.
  • Comms templates: internal updates and customer-friendly status notes.

Worked examples

Example 1: Sudden accuracy drop after a holiday (data drift)
  1. Detect: Drift monitor flags PSI = 0.35 (threshold 0.2); online AUC drops 5 points.
  2. Triage: Confirm feature distributions; segment impact (holiday traffic skew).
  3. Contain: Route 50% traffic to last-known-good model; increase sampling/guardrails.
  4. Recover: Hotfix with segmentation rule or retrain with recent data.
  5. Verify: Compare lift vs baseline; ensure drift back under threshold.
  6. Learn: Add seasonal features; update retraining cadence pre-holidays.
Example 2: Feature store outage causing timeouts
  1. Detect: p95 latency doubles; elevated 5xx from model service.
  2. Triage: Error logs show feature fetch failures; downstream dependent service.
  3. Contain: Switch to cached features or default values; temporarily reduce feature set.
  4. Recover: Coordinate platform fix; warm caches; scale serving pods.
  5. Verify: Latency and error rates return to SLO; quality proxy stable.
  6. Learn: Add circuit breaker; graceful degradation path; synthetic checks.
Example 3: LLM prompt injection producing unsafe content
  1. Detect: Safety monitor alerts on toxic rate > threshold; user reports.
  2. Triage: Reproduce with sample prompts; confirm safety filter failures.
  3. Contain: Enable stricter moderation; add rule-based guardrails; temporarily block risky tools.
  4. Recover: Update system prompt and safety policies; fine-tune or swap to safer model variant.
  5. Verify: Red-team test set passes; toxic rate below threshold.
  6. Learn: Add attack pattern monitors; pre-release red-teaming; canary before full rollout.

First 90 minutes: ML incident playbook

  1. Page and assign roles: Incident Commander (IC), Ops, ML Owner, Comms.
  2. Define severity: Use impact to users/KPIs/safety; set SEV and timestamps.
  3. Stabilize first: Rollback to stable model or enable fallback rules. Prefer safe defaults over perfect predictions.
  4. Narrow scope: Identify affected segments, features, or endpoints; canary containments.
  5. Form hypothesis: Data drift? Upstream change? New model? Infrastructure?
  6. Gather evidence: Dashboards for latency, error rate, drift (PSI/JS), business KPIs, logs, recent deploys.
  7. Recover: Retrain, revert config, restore features, patch prompts/filters.
  8. Verify: Check SLOs, shadow tests, A/B or backtests; remove temporary throttles.
  9. Communicate: Regular updates with impact, actions, ETA, and next check-in.
  10. Record: Timeline, decisions, metrics for post-incident review.

Exercises

Practice these to build reflexes. Then take the quick test at the end. Everyone can take the test; only logged-in users get saved progress.

Exercise 1 (ex1) — Draft a 1-page ML incident runbook

  • Timebox: 25 minutes.
  • Use your current or an imaginary ML service (e.g., churn model, ranking, LLM assistant).
  • Include: ownership, SLOs, severity map, detection triggers, first-hour checklist, rollback/fallback rules, verification, comms template.
Template hints
  • Ownership: On-call, escalation contacts.
  • SLOs: availability, latency, quality proxies, safety thresholds.
  • Triggers: drift PSI > X, AUC drop > Y, toxic rate > Z, error rate > A.
  • First-hour: stabilize → scope → evidence → comms.
  • Fallbacks: last-known-good model, rules-only, cached features.
  • Verify: metrics back within thresholds; canary OK.

Exercise 2 (ex2) — Triage a drift alert

Given: PSI(feature_price)=0.32 (thr 0.2), p95 latency stable, error rate normal, A/B shows -3% conversion in mobile users only, last deploy 2 hours ago (feature normalization change).

  • Decide SEV level and immediate containment.
  • List top 3 diagnostic checks.
  • Pick a rollback or patch approach and define verification metric.
Tips
  • Prioritize business impact and scope (mobile segment).
  • Recent deploys are prime suspects.
  • Rollback fast; fix forward after stabilization.

Common mistakes and self-check

  • Chasing perfect root cause before stabilizing service. Fix: rollback first.
  • No quality proxies in prod. Fix: add drift, calibration, and safety monitors.
  • Confusing infrastructure latency with model quality issues. Fix: separate dashboards and alerts.
  • Over-broad changes during incidents. Fix: one change at a time; document.
  • Poor comms cadence. Fix: schedule updates (e.g., every 30 minutes) with impact and ETA.
Self-check
  • Can you restore safe, predictable behavior within 60 minutes?
  • Do you have clear rollback/fallback for every critical model?
  • Are SLOs and thresholds defined and alerting?
  • Can you run a tabletop drill end-to-end in under 45 minutes?

Practical projects

  • Build a drift-and-safety dashboard with synthetic canaries; set actionable thresholds.
  • Create a full runbook for one production model, including comms templates and decision tables.
  • Run a 60-minute tabletop: simulate drift, execute rollback, post-incident review with action items.
  • Implement a fallback path: last-known-good model + minimal feature set + rules-only mode.

Who this is for, prerequisites, and learning path

Who this is for

  • Machine Learning Engineers, Data Scientists on-call, MLOps/Platform Engineers, and Product Engineers who own ML features.

Prerequisites

  • Basic model evaluation (AUC, accuracy, calibration).
  • Understanding of your serving stack and deployment process.
  • Access to monitoring dashboards and logs (or mock equivalents).

Learning path

  • Start with SLOs and alert thresholds.
  • Define rollback/fallback mechanisms.
  • Write a runbook; run a tabletop drill.
  • Automate: canaries, circuit breakers, safety filters.
  • Institutionalize: post-incident reviews and recurring checks.

Mini challenge

You receive: AUC -7% on desktop traffic; drift PSI high on feature_city; p95 latency OK; last content campaign launched 3 hours ago. In 8 bullet points, outline your first 30 minutes: assign roles, set SEV, immediate containment, top diagnostics, rollback plan, comms note, verification metrics, and next checkpoint.

Next steps

  • Finish the exercises and ensure your 1-page runbook is ready.
  • Run a 30-minute tabletop with a teammate.
  • Take the quick test below to lock in concepts. Everyone can take it; only logged-in users get saved progress.

Quick Test

Answer a few questions to check your readiness. Passing score: 70%.

Practice Exercises

2 exercises to complete

Instructions

Create a concise runbook for one production-like ML service. Include:

  • Ownership and escalation
  • SLOs (latency, availability, quality proxies, safety)
  • Severity mapping
  • Detection triggers and alert thresholds
  • First-hour checklist
  • Rollback/fallback decision table
  • Verification steps
  • Comms templates (internal + user-friendly)

Timebox: 25 minutes. Keep it actionable and copy-pastable during pressure.

Expected Output
A single page (or equivalent) runbook covering ownership, SLOs, triggers, first-hour actions, rollback/fallback, verification, and comms.

Incident Response For ML — Quick Test

Test your knowledge with 8 questions. Pass with 70% or higher.

8 questions70% to pass

Have questions about Incident Response For ML?

AI Assistant

Ask questions about this tool