luvv to helpDiscover the Best Free Online Tools
Topic 1 of 6

Model Versioning And Metadata

Learn Model Versioning And Metadata for free with explanations, exercises, and a quick test (for MLOps Engineer).

Published: January 4, 2026 | Updated: January 4, 2026

Who this is for

MLOps Engineers, Data Scientists, and Platform Engineers who need reliable, reproducible model releases across dev, staging, and production.

Prerequisites

  • Basic Git knowledge (commits, tags).
  • Familiarity with training pipelines and model artifacts (e.g., pickle, ONNX, TorchScript).
  • Understanding of evaluation metrics and datasets (train/val/test splits).

Why this matters

Real tasks you will face:

  • Rolling back a bad production model fast and safely.
  • Answering “Which code, data, and parameters produced this model?”
  • Promoting models from Staging to Production with audit-ready metadata.
  • Running A/B or shadow tests with clean lineage and comparison.

Good versioning and metadata make releases predictable, debuggable, and compliant.

Concept explained simply

Think of your model registry like a library:

  • Each model version is a new edition of the same book.
  • Metadata is the library card: who wrote it, when, which printing press (code), which paper (data), quality score (metrics), and how to find it again.

Mental model

Version = immutable snapshot of artifacts + rich metadata. Stages (e.g., Staging, Production) are movable labels pointing to specific versions.

Core components you need

  • Model artifact: file(s) you deploy (e.g., model.onnx, tokenizer.json).
  • Versioning scheme: e.g., semantic versioning MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH or auto-incremented numeric versions.
  • Metadata fields:
    • Identity: model name, version, stage (Dev/Staging/Production), owners.
    • Lineage: code commit/commit tag, training pipeline run ID, feature store version.
    • Data: dataset snapshot ID or hash, time window, sampling rules.
    • Training: hyperparameters, random seeds, hardware, training time.
    • Metrics: offline metrics (val/test), thresholds, confidence intervals where applicable.
    • Runtime: framework version, Docker image digest, dependency lockfile hash.
    • Compliance: PII notes, risk level, approval status, reviewer.
    • Notes/Tags: free-form key–value tags, change summary, deprecation status.
  • Stages/aliases: movable pointers like “Production → v12”.
  • Policies: who can create, promote, deprecate, or delete versions.

Versioning strategies

  • Immutable versions: once published, never change the artifacts or metadata that impact reproducibility.
  • Semantic Versioning (SemVer):
    • MAJOR: incompatible model interface or schema change.
    • MINOR: new feature/architecture or retrain with expected behavior change.
    • PATCH: bug fix with same intended behavior (e.g., fixed seed, minor preprocessing bug).
  • Stage aliases: promote by moving aliases (Staging → v15, Production → v12) instead of rewriting versions.
  • Branching/Forking: create a new model name or branch when experiments diverge significantly (e.g., classic-ctr vs gbdt-ctr).

Worked examples

Example 1: First release with clean lineage
  1. Train a model with commit abc123 and dataset snapshot ds_2025_10_01.
  2. Register as v1 with metadata: commit=abc123, dataset=ds_2025_10_01, metrics={auc:0.86}, docker_digest=sha256:... , seed=42.
  3. Set stage Staging → v1. After validation, promote Production → v1.
Example 2: Patch hotfix for preprocessing bug
  1. Bug fix in code (commit def456) that corrects a normalization step; interface unchanged.
  2. Retrain; register as v1.0.1 with metadata change_type=patch, commit=def456.
  3. Compare metrics to v1.0.0; if improved or equal and safe, move Production → v1.0.1.
Example 3: Rollback from bad production metrics
  1. Production points to v12; monitoring shows conversion drop.
  2. Move Production → v11 (immutable version already in registry). No rebuild needed.
  3. Tag v12 as deprecated and add root-cause notes in metadata.
Example 4: A/B test with two candidates
  1. Register v20 and v21 with different feature sets; both reference the same dataset snapshot where possible.
  2. Attach experiment_id to both versions; deploy as canary/shadow.
  3. Record online metrics per version; promote the winner by updating Production alias.

Practical workflow (step-by-step)

  1. Train: Produce artifacts and capture run metadata automatically.
  2. Register: Create a new immutable version with all lineage fields filled.
  3. Validate: Gate with checks (schema, metrics thresholds, bias tests) recorded in metadata.
  4. Promote: Move stage alias to the approved version; record approver and reason.
  5. Monitor: Link online metrics dashboards to the version; store drift alerts as tags.
  6. Rollback or Iterate: Use aliases to switch versions; keep notes for audit trail.

Metadata checklist

  • Model identity: name, version, stage, owners.
  • Code lineage: repo URL (as text), commit hash, pipeline run ID.
  • Data lineage: dataset snapshot ID/hash, feature definitions version, time window.
  • Training setup: hyperparameters, seeds, hardware, duration.
  • Artifacts: model files, preprocessing assets, schema, signature.
  • Environment: framework version, Docker image digest, dependency lockfile hash.
  • Metrics: offline metrics, dataset split, acceptance thresholds.
  • Approvals: reviewer, date, decision, risk notes.
  • Online linkage: monitoring job ID, alert thresholds.
  • Change summary: what changed and why (SemVer bump rationale).

Exercises

Do these now. The Quick Test below is available to everyone; log in to save your progress.

Exercise 1: Design a versioning plan for a CTR model

Define how you will version a click-through-rate (CTR) model across Dev, Staging, Production. Include SemVer rules and stage alias policy.

  • Decide which changes trigger MAJOR/MINOR/PATCH.
  • Describe how to roll back within 2 minutes.
  • Specify who can promote to Production and what must be checked.

Exercise 2: Draft a minimal metadata schema

Write a compact JSON-like schema that ensures full reproducibility for your model. Include code, data, metrics, and environment fields.

Need a hint?
  • Tie versions to immutable artifacts and commit hashes.
  • Use aliases like Production/Staging for promotions and rollbacks.
  • Include dataset snapshot IDs and dependency lockfile/Docker digests.
Show example solutions

Exercise 1 — Example

{
  "versioning": {
    "scheme": "semver",
    "rules": {
      "MAJOR": "feature schema or output contract change",
      "MINOR": "new feature set/architecture retrain",
      "PATCH": "bug fix or non-behavioral change"
    }
  },
  "stages": {
    "aliases": ["Dev", "Staging", "Production"],
    "promotion": {
      "required_checks": ["schema_ok", "metric_auc>=0.85", "bias_check_ok"],
      "approver_role": "ML Lead"
    },
    "rollback": "move Production alias to previous known-good version; immutable versions guaranteed"
  }
}

Exercise 2 — Example

{
  "model_name": "ctr_ranking",
  "version": "1.2.0",
  "owners": ["mlops@company"],
  "code": {"repo": "git@example:ml/ctr.git", "commit": "abc123"},
  "data": {"snapshot_id": "ds_2025_10_01", "features_version": "feats_v7"},
  "training": {"params": {"lr": 0.01, "depth": 8}, "seed": 42, "hardware": "A10G"},
  "artifacts": {"model": "model.onnx", "preproc": "featspec.json"},
  "env": {"framework": "onnxruntime 1.17", "docker_digest": "sha256:...", "lockfile_hash": "..."},
  "metrics": {"split": "val", "auc": 0.87, "logloss": 0.42, "thresholds": {"auc": ">=0.85"}},
  "approvals": {"reviewer": "ml_lead", "status": "approved", "date": "2025-10-03"},
  "notes": {"change": "Added user_age feature", "risk": "low"}
}

Self-check checklist

  • Can you promote or roll back without rebuilding artifacts?
  • Can someone reproduce the model with only the metadata?
  • Is the SemVer bump justified by the actual change?

Common mistakes and self-check

  • Mutable versions: Editing artifacts after registration. Self-check: hash of model file should never change for a version.
  • Missing data lineage: Not recording snapshot/hash. Self-check: can you locate the exact dataset used?
  • Unclear promotion criteria: Ad-hoc decisions. Self-check: list objective thresholds before training.
  • Environment drift: Deploying with different libraries than training. Self-check: store Docker digest and lockfile hash.
  • Overloaded tags: Free-form notes without structure. Self-check: keep core fields structured, use tags only for extras.

Practical projects

  • Build a local registry directory structure with immutable version folders and a metadata.json per version; write a CLI script to promote stage aliases.
  • Create a reproducibility report generator that turns metadata into a one-page audit (who, what, when, thresholds, results).
  • Implement a rollback playbook: given a Production alias, automatically switch to the last passing version and notify owners (simulation).

Learning path

  • Before this: experiment tracking, dataset versioning, CI basics.
  • Now: model versioning + metadata (this lesson).
  • Next: promotion workflows, governance, monitoring and drift handling.

Next steps

  • Adopt immutable versioning and stage aliases in your current project.
  • Fill the metadata checklist for your latest model and fix any gaps.
  • Document promotion criteria that your team will enforce.

Mini challenge

Scenario: A new Production model v3.1.0 shows a 4% KPI drop. In 5 steps, outline how you will roll back, investigate, and update metadata so the issue cannot repeat.

Suggested outline
  1. Move Production → previous known-good version (v3.0.2); record rollback timestamp and reason.
  2. Freeze v3.1.0 with a tag "investigation"; collect online metrics and input samples.
  3. Compare lineage: commit, dataset snapshot, env digest; check for mismatches vs Staging.
  4. Fix root cause; register v3.1.1 with change_type=patch; attach validation evidence.
  5. Promote after checks; add postmortem link/note to both v3.1.0 and v3.1.1 metadata.

Practice Exercises

2 exercises to complete

Instructions

Define SemVer rules, stage alias policy, promotion checks, and a 2-minute rollback approach for a CTR model used in production.

  • Map typical changes (schema change, new features, bug fix) to MAJOR/MINOR/PATCH.
  • State who can promote and which metrics must pass.
  • Describe exact rollback commands or actions using aliases.
Expected Output
A concise plan describing SemVer rules, alias usage (Dev/Staging/Production), promotion criteria, and rollback steps using immutable versions.

Model Versioning And Metadata — Quick Test

Test your knowledge with 8 questions. Pass with 70% or higher.

8 questions70% to pass

Have questions about Model Versioning And Metadata?

AI Assistant

Ask questions about this tool