Documentation And Governance

Why this matters

In production NLP, solid documentation and governance mean faster reviews, safer launches, and fewer incidents. Typical tasks you will face:

• Ship a new sentiment model with a clear model card, evaluation evidence, and risk sign-offs.
• Trace a prediction back to the exact dataset slice and model version during an incident.
• Prove that PII handling and content moderation policies were followed.
• Decide whether a prompt update, retrain, or rollback is allowed—based on a documented change process.

Concept explained simply

Documentation is the living, versioned story of your NLP system—what it is, how it was built, how it behaves, and how to operate it. Governance is the set of rules and checkpoints that guide decisions about changes, risks, and access.

Mental model

• Three rings to remember:
  • What you built: model cards, data sheets, system diagrams.
  • How you built it: pipelines, parameters, training configs, change logs.
  • How you control it: policies, gates, roles, approvals, audit trails.
• Think of docs as a flight recorder (+ user manual), and governance as guardrails with signposts.

Core components you should have

• Model card: purpose, intended use, limits, metrics, fairness checks, security/privacy notes, version, owners, rollback plan.
• Dataset data sheet: source, collection process, consent/PII handling, labeling protocol, known biases, licenses, versions.
• System overview: architecture, dependencies, environment, lineage from data to model to service.
• Change log: what changed, why, who approved, date, risk impact, rollback strategy.
• Governance workflow: roles (RACI), required gates (e.g., fairness review, security review), approval criteria, evidence to attach.
• Audit & traceability: request/response logging policy, model/dataset hashes, decision logs, retention period.
• Policy pack: PII handling, content standards, dataset licensing, access control, incident response.
• Lifecycle states: experimental → staging → production → deprecated, with entry/exit criteria for each.

Worked examples

Step-by-step: Stand up documentation and governance for a small NLP service

1. Pick templates: Adopt model card, data sheet, change log, and incident report templates.
2. Define taxonomy: Name versions consistently (dataset vX.Y, model hash, code tag).
3. Repo structure: /docs/model_card.md, /docs/dataset_sheets/, /docs/policies/, /docs/runbooks/.
4. Gatekeeping: Use CODEOWNERS for required reviewers; add a PR template with checkboxes for evidence.
5. Evidence capture: Pipeline exports metrics and hashes into JSON; CI writes them into model_card.md.
6. Traceability: Log model hash, dataset version, config hash, request ID, and input hash per inference.
7. Risk register: Track risks (bias, PII leak, toxicity) with severity, owner, mitigation.
8. Policies: PII redaction, data retention (e.g., 30/90/365 days), access control, incident response.
9. Lifecycle gates: Define criteria to move from staging to production (metric thresholds, bias deltas, approvals).
10. Dry-run audit: Pretend an incident happened; confirm you can trace a prediction end-to-end in minutes.

Exercises

Common mistakes and self-check

• Doc drift: Updating the model but not the model card. Fix: auto-populate metrics and hashes in CI.
• Missing lineage: No clear path from raw data to release. Fix: require lineage text or diagram on every dataset version.
• Chat-only decisions: Approvals buried in chat threads. Fix: PR templates with required checkboxes and names.
• Weak logging: Can’t trace predictions. Fix: include model hash, dataset version, config hash, request ID, and timestamp in logs.
• Ambiguous ownership: No one on-call. Fix: list owners in every artifact.
• Policy blind spots: PII rules unclear. Fix: short, explicit policy with examples and retention windows.

Practical projects

• Turn an existing NLP repo into a governed service: add model card, data sheet, change log, and gates in CI.
• Implement a metadata export step that writes metrics and hashes into the model card on every training run.
• Create a dataset release checklist and generate a textual lineage for three past versions.
• Set up a minimal audit trail: log request ID, input hash, model hash, dataset version, and latency.
• Run a mock audit: pick a random prediction and assemble all evidence in a single report.

Learning path

1. Learn the artifacts: model cards, data sheets, change logs, incident reports.
2. Design governance gates: role owners, approval criteria, evidence list.
3. Automate: generate docs from pipeline metadata; enforce PR templates and CODEOWNERS.
4. Harden operations: audit logging, retention, on-call runbooks, incident drills.
5. Scale: bias/fairness evaluations, dataset licenses, and multi-model registries.

Who this is for

• NLP Engineers and MLOps Engineers shipping models to production.
• Data Scientists maintaining models beyond notebooks.
• Tech Leads who need repeatable approvals and audit trails.

Prerequisites

• Basic ML lifecycle knowledge (train/validate/deploy/monitor).
• Git and pull request workflows.
• Familiarity with CI/CD and environment promotion.
• Understanding of common NLP metrics and data privacy basics.

Mini challenge

Your text classification API shows a sudden precision drop after a dataset update. In a few sentences, outline how your documentation and governance would help you: which docs you check first, which logs prove the version change, who must approve rollback, and what evidence you attach to the incident report.

Next steps

• Add fairness/bias slices to every evaluation and include them in model cards.
• Introduce lifecycle states with clear promotion criteria and automatic checks.
• Expand the risk register and schedule periodic reviews.
• Practice quarterly incident drills to keep runbooks current.

Quick Test

Everyone can take the test. To save your progress, log in.