luvv to helpDiscover the Best Free Online Tools
Topic 5 of 8

Model Registry And Artifacts

Learn Model Registry And Artifacts for free with explanations, exercises, and a quick test (for NLP Engineer).

Published: January 5, 2026 | Updated: January 5, 2026

Why this matters

As an NLP Engineer, you ship models that power user-facing features like search, chat, classification, and content moderation. A model registry and clean artifact management let you:

  • Promote models safely from experimentation to production.
  • Reproduce any result (same code, data snapshot, tokenizer, and config).
  • Rollback fast when metrics drift or bugs appear.
  • Track lineage for audits and compliance.
Real tasks you'll do on the job
  • Register a new text-classification model with tokenizer, label map, and evaluation metrics.
  • Promote a model from Staging to Production after passing canary checks.
  • Rollback to a previous model version when latency spikes.
  • Archive deprecated models while retaining full lineage and signatures.

Who this is for

  • NLP Engineers moving from notebooks to production.
  • Data/ML Engineers building CI/CD for NLP models.
  • Scientists who need reliable experiment tracking and reproducibility.

Prerequisites

  • Comfort with Python packaging and virtual environments.
  • Basic understanding of model training and evaluation for NLP.
  • Familiarity with Git and semantic versioning.

Concept explained simply

Think of the model registry as a library catalog for your models. Each "book" (model version) has a unique ID, description, authorship, and location. Artifacts are the files you need to run the model: weights, tokenizer, vocab, configs, label maps, and environment specs.

Mental model

Picture a pipeline with gates:

  • Experiment: Many versions appear quickly (v0.1, v0.2...).
  • Staging: A few selected versions pass tests and can be A/B tested.
  • Production: One or more versions serve traffic (with aliases like "prod" or "current").
  • Archive: Old versions, kept immutable for reproducibility and audits.
Registry core ideas
  • Versioning: Immutable versions; readable aliases (e.g., "prod") point to one version.
  • Signatures: The input/output schema you promise to clients.
  • Lineage: Code commit, dataset snapshot, feature pipeline, and training environment.
  • Stages: Experiment → Staging → Production → Archived.

What to store for NLP models

  • Model weights and architecture config.
  • Tokenizer + vocab (e.g., BPE merges, SentencePiece model).
  • Pre/post-processing code (text normalization, truncation rules, special tokens).
  • Label mapping (id→string, string→id) and task schema (e.g., classes, prompts).
  • Environment spec (requirements.txt/conda.yaml), Python version, OS/CPU/GPU dependencies.
  • Evaluation results (metrics, datasets, slices, confidence intervals).
  • Data lineage (dataset version hashes, feature pipeline commit).
  • Security and compliance notes (PII handling, forbidden tokens filter if relevant).
Checklist: Must-have artifacts
  • model.bin / model.safetensors
  • config.json (architecture, max_seq_len)
  • tokenizer.json + merges.txt / sentencepiece.model
  • labels.json
  • preprocess.py / postprocess.py
  • signature.json (input/output schema)
  • metrics.json (overall and slice metrics)
  • conda.yaml or requirements.txt + python_version.txt
  • train_args.json + data_version.txt (hash or tag)

Registry structure and naming

Keep versions immutable and human-readable:

  • Model name: nlp-sentiment
  • Versions: 1, 2, 3 (append build metadata if needed: 3+gpu)
  • Aliases: staging, prod, canary, shadow
  • Content-addressable artifacts: Store by secure hash to ensure immutability.
Naming tips
  • Use lowercase, hyphenated names: nlp-ner, nlp-summarizer.
  • Store artifacts under model/version/ (e.g., nlp-sentiment/3/).
  • Attach tags: {"language":"en","domain":"reviews","framework":"torch"}.

Governance and promotion flow

  1. Train and log artifacts + metadata.
  2. Run automated checks: signature validation, unit tests for preprocess/postprocess.
  3. Evaluate on holdout and slice metrics (e.g., short vs. long texts, language variants).
  4. Security scan: dependency and license checks.
  5. Promote to Staging; run canary/shadow tests.
  6. Approve and promote to Production; set alias prod → version N.
  7. Monitor; if regressions appear, rollback: prod → version N-1.
Promotion criteria (example)
  • Overall F1 ≥ 0.90 on primary dataset
  • Worst-slice F1 ≥ 0.80
  • p95 latency ≤ 60 ms CPU or ≤ 20 ms GPU
  • Memory ≤ 1 GB; container image ≤ 2.5 GB
  • No critical security issues

Worked examples

Example 1: Register a text classifier

Scenario: You trained nlp-sentiment version 7. You log weights, tokenizer, label map, and metrics. You attach tags language=en, domain=reviews.

  • Artifacts: model.safetensors, config.json, tokenizer.json, merges.txt, labels.json
  • Metadata: git_commit=ab12cd3, data_version=reviews_v3_hash, framework=torch2.2
  • Signature: input: {text: string, max_len: 256}, output: {label: string, score: float}
  • Stage: staging
Resulting registry entry (conceptual)
{
  "name": "nlp-sentiment",
  "version": 7,
  "aliases": ["staging"],
  "tags": {"language":"en","domain":"reviews"},
  "artifacts": ["model.safetensors","config.json","tokenizer.json","merges.txt","labels.json"],
  "signature": {
    "inputs": {"text":"string","max_len":"int<=256"},
    "outputs": {"label":"string","score":"float[0,1]"}
  },
  "lineage": {"git_commit":"ab12cd3","data_version":"reviews_v3_hash"},
  "metrics": {"f1":0.915,"latency_p95_ms":18}
}

Example 2: Canary and promotion

Scenario: Compare v7 (candidate) vs v6 (prod). v7 wins on accuracy, slightly slower but within SLO. Promote v7: set alias prod → 7, keep v6 archived with alias prev_prod for quick rollback.

  • Before: prod → 6
  • After: prod → 7, prev_prod → 6
Rollback playbook
  • Change alias: prod → 6
  • Invalidate serving cache; restart pods if needed
  • Create incident note in registry: reason=latency regression

Example 3: Signature change without breaking clients

Scenario: You add optional field explain=true to request. Keep signature backward compatible: default explain=false. Register as v8; clients that ignore explain continue to work.

  • signature_in_v8: inputs: text, max_len, explain?; outputs: label, score, optionally rationale
  • Compatibility strategy: optional fields only; avoid changing existing types.

How to build a minimal registry workflow

  1. Decide model naming and stages (experiment, staging, prod, archived).
  2. Define a signature JSON schema and validate it in CI.
  3. Define an artifact manifest (YAML/JSON) listing every file with checksums.
  4. Store artifacts immutably (content-addressed paths).
  5. Attach metadata: code commit, dataset hash, metrics, tags.
  6. Automate promotions with checklists and approvals.
Artifact manifest fields (recommended)
  • name, version, created_at
  • files: path, sha256, size_bytes, type
  • signature: input/output schema
  • lineage: git_commit, data_version, training_env
  • metrics: global and slice metrics
  • tags: language, domain, model_family
  • notes: constraints, known limitations

Common mistakes and self-check

  • Forgetting tokenizer files → model loads but outputs nonsense. Self-check: verify tokenization round-trip in CI.
  • No label map → misaligned outputs. Self-check: assert predicted id maps to expected label names.
  • Mutable artifacts → "works on my machine" issues. Self-check: enforce checksums and content-addressable storage.
  • Untracked preprocessing → silent accuracy drops. Self-check: unit-test preprocess/postprocess scripts with fixtures.
  • Breaking signature changes → client outages. Self-check: contract tests against the signature schema.
Quick self-audit checklist
  • All artifacts listed with hashes
  • Signature validated in CI
  • Metrics include worst-slice analysis
  • Aliases used for prod/staging
  • Rollback plan documented

Exercises

Do these now to make the ideas stick. Everyone can take the test; only logged-in users get saved progress.

Exercise 1: Write an artifact manifest for a classifier

Create a manifest for an English sentiment model v1 with required NLP artifacts, signature, and lineage. Use YAML. Include checksums (fake hashes are fine) and indicate file types.

Need a hint?
  • List every file under files with path, sha256, size_bytes, type.
  • Signature: inputs {text, max_len}, outputs {label, score}.
  • Include lineage (git commit, data version) and metrics.

Exercise 2: Plan promotion and rollback

v2 outperforms v1 on macro-F1 but is 10 ms slower, still within SLO. Define: promotion decision, alias changes, and a rollback command plan.

Need a hint?
  • Use prod and prev_prod aliases.
  • Document when to rollback (latency p99 breach, error spikes).
Exercise checklist
  • Manifest includes tokenizer and label map
  • Signature is explicit and versioned
  • Lineage is recorded (code + data)
  • Promotion and rollback steps are clear

Practical projects

  • Package a small text classifier with full manifest, then simulate a promotion to staging.
  • Add slice metrics by text length and language variant; store in metrics.json.
  • Create a backward-compatible signature update and test it with a dummy client.

Learning path

  1. Artifacts and signatures (this lesson)
  2. Model evaluation and monitoring
  3. CI/CD for training and serving
  4. Rollbacks, canaries, and shadow deployments

Next steps

  • Automate manifest generation in your training pipeline.
  • Add schema validation to CI to prevent breaking changes.
  • Adopt aliases for instant promotions and rollbacks.

Mini challenge

Your team wants to add support for multilingual inputs next quarter. Propose three tags and two signature updates that keep current clients working, and list one new slice metric you would add for fairness.

Practice Exercises

2 exercises to complete

Instructions

Write a YAML manifest for model nlp-sentiment version 1. Include:

  • files: model weights, config, tokenizer, merges, labels, preprocess/postprocess
  • signature: inputs {text, max_len}, outputs {label, score}
  • lineage: git_commit, data_version, training_env
  • metrics: f1, latency_p95_ms, and slice metrics
  • tags: language=en, domain=reviews
Expected Output
A valid YAML manifest containing the specified sections and fake checksums.

Model Registry And Artifacts — Quick Test

Test your knowledge with 8 questions. Pass with 70% or higher.

8 questions70% to pass

Have questions about Model Registry And Artifacts?

AI Assistant

Ask questions about this tool