luvv to helpDiscover the Best Free Online Tools
Topic 2 of 8

Data Sourcing And Sampling

Learn Data Sourcing And Sampling for free with explanations, exercises, and a quick test (for NLP Engineer).

Published: January 5, 2026 | Updated: January 5, 2026

Table of Contents

Why this matters

As an NLP Engineer, your model is only as good as the text data behind it. Sourcing the right text and sampling it correctly determines coverage of languages, domains, intents, and edge cases. Good sampling reduces bias, prevents data leakage, and cuts labeling costs while maintaining performance.

  • Real tasks you will do: build datasets from tickets, chats, reviews, docs; define inclusion/exclusion criteria; estimate sample sizes; balance classes; set train/validation/test splits that reflect real-world traffic; monitor drift and refresh samples.
  • Impact: better generalization, lower annotation spend, safer data (privacy/consent), faster iteration.

Concept explained simply

Data sourcing is choosing where your text comes from. Sampling is choosing which and how much to take from those places. Together, they answer: From which pools do we draw text, and in what proportions, so our model sees representative, safe, and useful examples?

Mental model

Imagine a map of all possible texts relevant to your task. You drop pins for key regions (languages, channels, topics, user types, time periods). Sourcing finds those regions. Sampling decides how many pins from each region so your final dataset looks like your target reality, plus a deliberate slice of rare but important cases.

Key concepts (open for quick reference)
  • Target population: the real-world text your model will face (e.g., support chats in English and Spanish, business hours).
  • Frame: the actual sources you can access (logs, APIs, archives, synthetic prompts).
  • Sampling strategies: random, stratified, proportional, undersampling/oversampling, time-based, active learning, diversity sampling.
  • Coverage planning: required representation for languages, intents, user segments, platforms, and the long tail.
  • Data leakage: same or near-duplicate content across train/validation/test, or future info in training for a time-based task.
  • Reproducibility: documented queries, fixed random seeds, deterministic hash-based splits.
  • Safety & privacy: remove PII, respect licenses/consent, filter harmful content for annotators.

Practical workflow: sourcing and sampling in 7 steps

  1. Define target population: write a one-paragraph description of who, where, when, and languages. Include what is out of scope.
  2. List candidate sources: logs, helpdesk tickets, product reviews, forums, internal wikis, open datasets, APIs, synthetic data.
  3. Set inclusion/exclusion rules: e.g., English and Spanish only; remove messages under 3 characters; exclude messages flagged as containing PII.
  4. Choose a sampling strategy: stratified by language and channel; add a controlled oversample of rare classes/edge cases; time-based slices if seasonality matters.
  5. Estimate sample sizes: back-calc from labeling budget and class prevalence. Add margin for deduplication (e.g., +10%).
  6. Split data: use hash-based or time-based splits; prevent author-thread leakage; keep class proportions comparable across splits.
  7. Quality checks: deduplicate, profanity/PII filters, language detectors, label pilot to estimate noise, adjust sampling.

Worked examples

Example 1: Support intent classifier (English + Spanish)

  • Target: classify user messages into 12 intents; EN 70%, ES 30%; web chat and email.
  • Sources: last 6 months of chat logs and email tickets.
  • Sampling: stratified by language (70/30) and channel (chat 60%, email 40%). Oversample 2 rare intents to reach at least 300 labeled examples each.
  • Split: hash by conversation_id; 80/10/10; ensure same user doesn’t appear across splits.
  • Checks: dedup near-duplicates; spot-check profanity; pilot-label 200 items to verify class definitions.

Example 2: Community toxicity filter

  • Target: detect toxic content in short posts; high class imbalance (~3% toxic).
  • Sources: moderated post archive with moderator decisions.
  • Sampling: proportional random sample + targeted oversample of posts that triggered automated flags (uncertainty/diversity sampling). Keep a clean proportional validation/test set (no oversample there).
  • Split: time-based split (first 80% time for train, next 10% val, last 10% test) to mimic deployment.
  • Checks: evaluate prevalence mismatch; recalibrate thresholds with validation metrics.

Example 3: Multilingual product review sentiment

  • Target: star rating prediction; languages EN/DE/FR; long-tail domains (electronics, apparel, home).
  • Sources: customer reviews over 12 months.
  • Sampling: stratified by language and domain; cap max 200 reviews per user; ensure at least 5% from each month to cover seasonality.
  • Split: hash by user_id; maintain language/domain proportions.
  • Checks: remove templated duplicates; verify language tags with a detector.

Who this is for and prerequisites

Who this is for

  • NLP Engineers building classification, NER, retrieval, or generation datasets.
  • Data Scientists planning labeling projects and evaluation.
  • ML Engineers maintaining data pipelines.

Prerequisites

  • Basic probability and sampling concepts.
  • Familiarity with text preprocessing and deduplication.
  • Understanding of train/validation/test splits and evaluation metrics.

Learning path

  1. Define target population and data risks for your use case.
  2. Design a sourcing plan with inclusion/exclusion rules.
  3. Choose sampling strategies and estimate sample sizes.
  4. Create robust splits to avoid leakage.
  5. Run a pilot sample, label, and refine.
  6. Scale up and set a refresh cadence to handle drift.

Checklists

Data sourcing checklist
  • Target population written and approved.
  • Sources listed with access/rights verified.
  • Inclusion/exclusion rules defined (language, length, channels).
  • Safety and privacy filters planned (PII removal, annotator guidance).
Sampling checklist
  • Strata defined (language, channel, domain, user segment).
  • Rare/edge cases explicitly budgeted.
  • Sample size estimates include dedup margin.
  • Split strategy prevents leakage and reflects deployment.

Common mistakes and self-check

  • Leakage across splits: Same conversation/user appears in train and test. Self-check: split by stable IDs (hash of user/conversation).
  • Overfitting to oversampled distribution: Model trained on oversampled data but evaluated on oversampled validation. Self-check: keep validation/test proportional.
  • Ignoring time: Using random splits when seasonality matters. Self-check: prefer time-based for drifting tasks.
  • Underrepresenting minority languages: Proportional sampling only. Self-check: set minimum counts per language.
  • Poor documentation: No record of queries and seeds. Self-check: log queries, time windows, random seeds, hash functions.
  • Unfiltered PII/toxic content: Risk to users/annotators. Self-check: apply PII and toxicity filters; provide warnings and escalation paths.

Exercises

Complete the tasks below. You can compare with the solutions. Quick Test is available to everyone; only logged-in users get saved progress.

  1. Exercise 1: Design a sourcing and sampling plan for a new intent classifier.
  2. Exercise 2: Estimate sample sizes for a rare class with labeling budget constraints.
Exercise 1 — Instructions

Scenario: E-commerce chat assistant, intents (12), EN 80% / ES 20%, chat only. Two rare intents (~1% each). Labeling budget: 5,000 items for training, 800 for validation, 800 for test.

  • Write inclusion/exclusion rules.
  • Choose sampling strategy and target counts per language and for rare intents in training.
  • Propose a split method to avoid leakage.
Exercise 2 — Instructions

Scenario: Toxicity detection with 2% toxic prevalence. You want at least 120 toxic items in training and 40 in validation (validation must reflect natural prevalence). Assume 10% duplicates removed after sourcing.

  • How many total items should you source for training and validation?
  • State your assumptions and show the math.

Mini challenge

Pick one of your current projects. In 10 minutes, write a one-page sourcing and sampling brief: target population, sources, rules, sampling, splits, and checks. Use the checklists above. Share with a teammate for feedback.

Practical projects

  • Build a reproducible sampler: given a CSV of messages with language, channel, and timestamp, output stratified train/validation/test splits with fixed seeds and hash-based grouping by conversation_id.
  • Create a coverage dashboard: counts by language, domain, month; rare class coverage; duplicate rate; prevalence differences between train/validation/test.
  • Active-learning pilot: run a simple classifier, sample uncertain and diverse items, compare annotation efficiency vs random sampling.

Next steps

  • Run a small pilot (500–1,000 items), label, measure noise and prevalence, and adjust sampling.
  • Automate deduplication and split logic in your data pipeline.
  • Schedule data refreshes (e.g., monthly) to capture drift.

Quick Test

Take the test to check your understanding. Passing score is 70%.

Practice Exercises

2 exercises to complete

Instructions

Scenario: E-commerce chat assistant, intents (12), EN 80% / ES 20%, chat only. Two rare intents (~1% each). Labeling budget: 5,000 train, 800 validation, 800 test.

  • Write inclusion/exclusion rules.
  • Choose sampling strategy and target counts per language and for rare intents in training.
  • Propose a split method to avoid leakage.
Expected Output
A brief plan listing rules, target counts, and a split method that avoids leakage and maintains proportions.

Data Sourcing And Sampling — Quick Test

Test your knowledge with 8 questions. Pass with 70% or higher.

8 questions70% to pass
Defining Task And Label SchemaAnnotation Guidelines

Have questions about Data Sourcing And Sampling?

AI Assistant

Ask questions about this tool