Relational database vs Lakehouse

Relational Database vs Lakehouse

Relational Database

Structured Data
ACID Transactions
SQL Queries
OLTP Focus

Lakehouse

Structured & Unstructured
Open Formats
BI & ML Workloads
Data Lake + Warehouse

This interactive guide helps you decide between a traditional relational database and a modern lakehouse architecture for your application or data platform.

By the end, you'll be able to choose based on:

Data Model Choice: Rigid schema vs. flexible, multi-format data.
Scaling Approach: Vertical vs. horizontal, cost of scale.
Query Needs: Real-time transactions vs. complex analytics & machine learning.
Reliability: ACID guarantees vs. eventual consistency and data versioning.
Cost: Licensing/per-core costs vs. storage-compute separation on object storage.

Which Database Type Should You Choose?

Answer these questions about your project. After each choice, open the details to see what it means for your decision.

1. What is the primary nature of your workload?

A: High-volume, real-time transactions (e.g., processing orders, updating user balances).

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Relational Database is usually better. It provides the ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) guarantees necessary for financial accuracy and data integrity.

B: Complex analytical queries on large historical datasets (e.g., business intelligence, trend analysis).

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse is often a strong fit. It's designed for scalable analytics and can handle petabytes of data using cost-effective object storage.

C: A mix of both, requiring some transactional integrity but also heavy reporting.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a hybrid approach might be necessary. You might start with a relational database for transactions and add a lakehouse for analytics, or evaluate a lakehouse with transactional support.

2. What is the structure and variety of your data?

A: Mostly structured, tabular data with clear relationships (e.g., customer, product, invoice tables).

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Relational Database is a natural choice. Its schema-on-write model ensures data quality and enables powerful joins.

B: A mix of structured, semi-structured (JSON, XML), and unstructured data (text, images, logs).

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse excels here. It allows you to store raw data in open formats (like Parquet, JSON) and apply schemas later during query time.

3. How frequently does your data schema change?

A: Rarely. The data model is well-defined and stable.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Relational Database works well. Schema migrations are manageable and enforce consistency.

B: Frequently. We experiment with new data sources and fields regularly.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse offers more flexibility with its schema-on-read approach, reducing the friction of schema evolution.

4. What are your performance latency requirements?

A: Millisecond response times for reads and writes are critical (e.g., user-facing app).

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Relational Database with optimized indexing and in-memory capabilities is typically the go-to for low-latency OLTP.

B: Seconds to minutes latency is acceptable for complex reports and machine learning jobs.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse is designed for these batch and interactive analytical workloads, trading off sub-second latency for massive parallelism.

5. How do you plan to scale your storage and compute?

A: Scale vertically (bigger machines) for consistency and simplicity.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a traditional Relational Database often scales up well, though it can become expensive.

B: Scale horizontally (more machines) independently for storage and compute to handle huge data volumes cost-effectively.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse architecture, built on cloud object storage, separates storage and compute, allowing independent, elastic scaling.

6. What is your team's primary skill set?

A: Strong in SQL and database administration.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Relational Database leverages familiar skills and has mature tooling for management and optimization.

B: Strong in data engineering, Spark, and programming languages like Python for data processing.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse platform (often accessed via Spark, Trino, or Python APIs) aligns better with these skills.

7. What is your budget model preference?

A: Predictable licensing or managed service costs, often tied to compute resources.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a managed Relational Database service (RDS, Cloud SQL) offers predictable pricing based on instance size.

B: Variable, pay-for-what-you-use costs, with very cheap storage and separate compute billing.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse on cloud storage (like S3, ADLS) has a low storage cost, and you only pay for compute during queries.

8. Do you need advanced analytics and machine learning directly on your data store?

A: No, our database is for application data; analytics are done elsewhere.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Relational Database might be sufficient. You can always export data to a separate analytics system later.

B: Yes, we want to run large-scale SQL analytics and ML frameworks (Spark, TensorFlow) directly on the same data repository.

What this means

If this sounds like you, a Lakehouse is built for this. It provides a single platform for BI, SQL analytics, and machine learning.

Review your answers. If you selected mostly A's, lean towards a Relational Database. If mostly B's, a Lakehouse may be your path. Many C's suggest a hybrid.

TL;DR: Quick Comparison

Aspect	Relational Database	Lakehouse
Best For	Online Transaction Processing (OLTP), applications requiring ACID transactions, consistent structured data.	Large-scale analytics, machine learning, combining data lakes and warehouses, handling diverse data types.
Strengths	Data integrity, strong consistency, mature tooling, efficient point queries and joins, standardized SQL.	Massive scalability, cost-effective storage, schema flexibility, support for BI, AI, and data science workloads.
Weaknesses	Scaling can be expensive, schema rigidity, less suited for unstructured data and petabyte-scale analytics.	Higher latency for point updates, eventual consistency models, more complex data governance, newer ecosystem.
Typical Use Cases	E-commerce platforms, banking systems, CRM, ERP - any core business application.	Customer 360 analytics, log analysis, fraud detection models, data science research platforms.

Disclaimer: This is a simplified overview. The best choice heavily depends on your specific context, volume, and team expertise.

Deep Dive: Understanding the Trade-Offs

a) What Are These Options?

A Relational Database (RDBMS) organizes data into tables with rows and columns, enforcing a predefined schema. Relationships between tables are established using keys. It uses SQL for querying and is built for reliable transaction processing.

A Lakehouse is a modern architecture that combines the flexibility and cost-efficiency of a data lake (store anything) with the management and ACID features of a data warehouse (query efficiently). Data is stored in open file formats (like Parquet) on object storage, and metadata layers enable transaction support and performance optimization.

Which of these matters to you? Check all that apply to your project:

I need to ensure every financial transaction is perfectly accurate.
I want to store raw sensor data now and decide how to analyze it later.
My data analysts only know and want to use SQL.
I expect my data volume to grow beyond terabytes.

If you checked the first and third boxes, keep reading about Relational Databases. If you checked the second and fourth, focus on the Lakehouse sections.

b) Why These Options Exist: The Evolution of Data Management

Relational databases emerged to solve the problem of data inconsistency in business applications. The ACID model became the gold standard for reliability.

Lakehouses arose from the limitations of previous architectures: Data Warehouses were expensive and rigid for big data, while Data Lakes were flexible but became chaotic "data swamps." The lakehouse aims to unify them.

Advanced: The CAP Theorem and Trade-Offs

Distributed systems face trade-offs between Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance (CAP). Traditional relational databases often prioritize Consistency and Availability (CA) in non-partitioned scenarios. Lakehouses, built on distributed object storage and compute engines, often prioritize Availability and Partition Tolerance (AP), offering eventual consistency for better scalability, though many now add transactional consistency layers.

c) Strengths and Weaknesses Detailed

Relational Database Strengths: Proven ACID transactions, robust indexing for fast lookups, rich ecosystem (backup, monitoring, ORMs), and strong security models.

Relational Database Weaknesses: Scaling write throughput horizontally is challenging, schema changes can be slow, and cost per terabyte can be high for analytics.

Lakehouse Strengths: Decoupled storage/compute lowers cost, inherently supports diverse data (JSON, images, video), enables direct ML access, and scales to exabytes.

Lakehouse Weaknesses: Not optimized for high-frequency, small updates; SQL support may lag; requires more data engineering discipline to avoid quality issues.

If you answered "yes" to needing high-frequency updates, keep reading about Relational Databases. If "no," the Lakehouse weaknesses may be less concerning.

d) Performance, Scalability, and Consistency

Relational Database: Performance for OLTP is excellent with proper indexing. Scalability is often vertical (scale-up), though distributed SQL databases offer horizontal scale. Consistency is strong (immediate).

Lakehouse: Performance for large scans and aggregations is excellent due to parallel processing. Scalability is horizontal and virtually unlimited for storage. Consistency can be tuned; many lakehouses offer ACID transactions on tables now (e.g., Apache Iceberg, Delta Lake).

Advanced: Understanding Throughput vs Latency

Relational databases optimize for low latency on individual operations. Lakehouses optimize for high throughput on massive datasets. Your choice depends on whether you serve many quick requests or process fewer, huge jobs.

e) Ecosystem, Tools, and Support

Relational Database: Mature tools for administration (e.g., pgAdmin, MySQL Workbench), monitoring, and backup. Vast support for BI tools (Tableau, Power BI) via standard SQL connectors.

Lakehouse: Ecosystems revolve around open-source projects like Apache Spark, Trino, and table formats (Delta Lake, Iceberg, Hudi). Managed platforms include Databricks, Snowflake, and BigQuery. Support is more community and vendor-driven.

Check all that apply to your team:

We have dedicated database administrators.
Our data team prefers writing Python/Spark notebooks.
We use Tableau for all our reporting.
We are comfortable managing open-source data platforms.

f) Common Myths and Mistakes

Myth: "Lakehouses are just data lakes with a fancy name."

Reality: A true lakehouse adds critical warehouse features: ACID transactions, data versioning, schema enforcement, and performance optimizations (caching, indexing) on top of a data lake's open storage.

Myth: "Relational databases can't handle big data."

Reality: They can, but often at a high cost. For analytical queries on terabytes, specialized columnar stores (often within a lakehouse) are more cost-effective. However, distributed RDBMSs (like CockroachDB, Amazon Aurora) scale well for transactional workloads.

Mistake: Using a lakehouse for a high-traffic web app backend.

This is a mismatch. The latency and update patterns of a lakehouse are not designed for thousands of concurrent user transactions per second. Use a relational or NoSQL database for that.

g) Real-World Examples

Relational Database Typical Systems: PostgreSQL for a SaaS application user database, MySQL for a WordPress site, Oracle for a legacy banking core, Microsoft SQL Server for an enterprise ERP system.

Lakehouse Typical Workloads: Using Databricks Delta Lake to analyze years of retail sales data for forecasting, running Spark ML on user behavior logs stored in S3 to build recommendation models, creating a single source of truth for all company data in a cloud data platform.

h) What to Do If You Choose Each Option

Starter Checklist for a Relational Database:

Design a normalized schema based on your entities and relationships.
Choose a managed service (e.g., Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL) to reduce ops overhead.
Set up automated backups and point-in-time recovery.
Plan indexes based on your common query patterns (WHERE, JOIN clauses).
Use connection pooling for your application.

Starter Checklist for a Lakehouse:

Choose an open table format (Delta, Iceberg) and a compute engine (Spark, Trino).
Define a logical data layout (e.g., partitioned by date) on your object storage (S3, GCS).
Implement data ingestion pipelines (batch/streaming) to land raw data.
Set up a metadata catalog (like AWS Glue, Hive Metastore).
Define data quality checks and lineage tracking early.

i) Combining or Switching: Polyglot Persistence

It's common and often wise to use both. A classic pattern: use a Relational Database for your application's OLTP workload and then replicate data (via change data capture) to a Lakehouse for analytics, reporting, and machine learning. This keeps your application fast and reliable while enabling deep data insights.

If you have both transactional and analytical needs, a hybrid approach is likely your answer.

Making Your Final Decision

Choose a Relational Database if…

Your primary workload is online transaction processing (OLTP) with many small, concurrent reads and writes.
Data integrity and ACID compliance are non-negotiable (e.g., financial systems).
Your data is consistently structured and your schema is stable.
Your team values mature, well-understood operational tools and standard SQL.
Your dataset fits comfortably on a single large server or a small cluster.

Choose a Lakehouse if…

Your primary workload is analytics, business intelligence, or machine learning on large datasets.
You need to store and process a wide variety of data formats (structured, semi-structured, unstructured).
Cost-effective scaling to petabytes is a key requirement.
You want to unify your data lake and data warehouse into a single platform for all data users.
Your team is comfortable with data engineering tools (Spark, Python) and managing data quality.

Choose a Hybrid Approach if…

You have a clear OLTP application that needs a reliable database, but also require heavy analytics on that data.
You are migrating from a legacy warehouse and want to modernize incrementally.
You can accept the complexity of operating two systems that are synchronized via ETL/CDC pipelines.

Final Verdict: There is no single best choice; the right architecture depends on aligning the system's strengths with your most critical workload requirements and constraints.

Check Your Understanding

Answer these to confirm you've grasped the key differences.

1. Which architecture typically offers lower storage cost per terabyte?

A: Relational Database

Explanation

Usually not. Relational databases use block storage attached to servers, which is more expensive. Lakehouses use object storage (like S3), which is much cheaper for vast amounts of data.

B: Lakehouse

Explanation

Correct. The decoupled storage model of a lakehouse leverages highly scalable, low-cost object storage.

2. True or False: Lakehouses cannot handle ACID transactions.

A: True

Explanation

False. Modern lakehouse table formats (Delta Lake, Apache Iceberg) provide ACID transaction guarantees on tables, bridging a key gap with traditional databases.

B: False

Explanation

Correct. This is a common misconception. Lakehouses have evolved to support transactions.

3. If your app requires millisecond response times for user actions, which is a safer default choice?

A: Relational Database

Explanation

Correct. Relational databases are engineered and optimized for low-latency transactional workloads.

B: Lakehouse

Explanation

Not typically. While some lakehouse queries can be fast, they are not generally optimized for the pattern of many concurrent, point-level reads and writes.

4. Which option is more "schema-on-write"?

A: Relational Database

Explanation

Correct. You must define the schema (tables, columns, types) before you can insert data. This enforces data quality upfront.

B: Lakehouse

Explanation

Lakehouses generally follow a "schema-on-read" or flexible schema model, where you can apply structure when querying the data.

5. What is a key advantage of the lakehouse's separation of storage and compute?

A: It allows multiple different workloads (BI, ML) to query the same data simultaneously without copying.

Explanation

Correct. This is a major benefit. Different teams can spin up their own compute clusters to analyze the same central data store.

B: It makes simple point queries faster.

Explanation

Not really. This separation is geared towards scalability and cost for analytical workloads, not necessarily for improving simple key-value lookups.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a lakehouse replace my data warehouse entirely?

In many cases, yes, especially for greenfield projects. A lakehouse aims to provide the capabilities of a data warehouse (SQL performance, governance) on a more open and scalable foundation. However, for organizations deeply invested in a specific warehouse with complex stored procedures, a migration might be nontrivial.

Do I lose the ability to do JOINs in a lakehouse?

No. Lakehouses support SQL, including JOINs. The performance of joins on massive datasets can be excellent due to distributed computing engines like Spark. However, for highly normalized data with complex many-to-many relationships, a relational database's optimizer might still have an edge for transactional queries.

Is it more expensive to run analytics on a relational database?

Often, yes. Analytical queries scan large portions of data, which in an RDBMS requires powerful (and expensive) CPU and memory. In a lakehouse, you pay separately for storage (cheap) and transient compute for queries, which can be more cost-effective for intermittent, heavy analytics.

What is "object storage" and why is it important for lakehouses?

Object storage (e.g., Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage) is a scalable, durable, and cheap way to store files. Lakehouses use it as the primary storage layer because it allows them to separate the cost of storage from compute and scale infinitely. This is a fundamental shift from attaching disks directly to database servers.

Can I use SQL with a lakehouse?

Absolutely. A key promise of the lakehouse is full SQL support for analytics. You interact with data using SQL through engines like Trino, Spark SQL, or the built-in SQL interfaces of platforms like Databricks and Snowflake.

How does indexing differ between these two?

Relational databases use B-tree indexes for fast point lookups and range queries. Lakehouses use a combination of techniques: partitioning, data skipping (via file statistics), and format-specific indexing (like Bloom filters in Parquet). They are optimized for full-table scans rather than random access.

What is "sharding" and which architecture uses it?

Sharding is splitting a database horizontally across multiple machines based on a key. It's a common scaling technique for relational databases (and NoSQL) to distribute load. In lakehouses, the concept is different; data is naturally distributed as files in object storage, and the compute engine (like Spark) handles the distribution of processing.

Are lakehouses only for the cloud?

While born in the cloud era due to cheap object storage, lakehouse principles can be implemented on-premises using storage like HDFS and open-source table formats. However, the economic and scalability benefits are most pronounced in the cloud.

What is the role of a "metadata layer" in a lakehouse?

It's crucial. The metadata layer tracks the schema, partitioning, data versions, and transaction logs for tables. This is what transforms a collection of files in object storage into a manageable, queryable database-like entity with ACID properties. Examples are the Delta Lake transaction log or the Iceberg metadata tables.

How do backups work in a lakehouse?

Because data is stored immutably in object storage, which often has built-in redundancy and versioning, the concept changes. "Backups" often involve replicating data to another region (for disaster recovery) and managing data lifecycle policies. Point-in-time recovery is achieved through the transaction log, allowing you to roll back to a previous snapshot.

Can I run a website backend on a lakehouse?

It's not recommended. The access patterns (many small, random reads/writes with low latency) are antithetical to a lakehouse's design for large-scale analytical processing. Use a relational or NoSQL database for your web application's primary data store.

What is "polyglot persistence"?

It's the practice of using different data storage technologies (relational, lakehouse, graph, cache) within a single application, each chosen for its strengths for a specific type of data or query. This is a realistic outcome of understanding these trade-offs.

Is eventual consistency a problem in lakehouses?

For analytical workloads, eventual consistency is often acceptable because reports are based on slightly stale data. However, as mentioned, modern lakehouse formats provide strong consistency for table operations. The consistency model is more tunable and complex than in a traditional RDBMS.

Menu

Relational database vs Lakehouse

AI Assistant

Was this tool helpful?