Relational database vs Multimodel database

Your Data, Your Choice

Navigate the core trade-offs between structured reliability and flexible agility to find the best fit for your application.

Structured Data Complex Relationships Rapid Iteration Massive Scale Multiple Data Types

This interactive guide helps you decide between a relational database (like PostgreSQL or MySQL) and a multimodel database (like ArangoDB or Cosmos DB) based on your specific use case, data patterns, and system goals.

Here’s what this comparison will help you with:

Data Model Choice: Rigid schema vs. flexible, multiple models.
Scaling Approach: Vertical vs. horizontal scalability.
Query Needs: Complex joins vs. diverse query types (documents, graphs, key-value).
Reliability: ACID guarantees vs. tunable consistency.
Cost & Complexity: Operational overhead and total cost of ownership.

Which database type should you choose?

Answer these scenario-based questions to get a preliminary recommendation. Explore each choice for more insight.

1. What is the primary structure of your data?

A) Highly structured, with clear relationships between entities (e.g., customer orders, inventory management).

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Relational database is usually better. Its table-based schema and powerful JOIN operations excel at managing structured, interconnected data.
B) A mix of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data (e.g., user profiles with preferences, social connections, and activity logs).

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Multimodel database is often a better fit. It can handle documents, graphs, and key-value pairs within a single system.
C) Simple, independent records with minimal relationships (e.g., session storage, product catalogs).

See explanation

If this sounds like you, either could work, but a Multimodel database in document mode or a simple relational table might suffice. Consider other factors like scalability.

2. How often does your data schema change?

A) Rarely. The core business entities and their relationships are stable.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Relational database is ideal. Its fixed schema provides data integrity and performance optimizations for stable structures.
B) Frequently. We're iterating quickly and need to add new fields or data types without downtime.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Multimodel database (particularly in document mode) is usually better. Schemaless or flexible schema design allows for agile development.

3. What are your critical query patterns?

A) Complex analytical queries with aggregations and multi-table joins.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Relational database with robust SQL support is typically the strongest choice.
B) Traversing deep relationships or networks (e.g., friend recommendations, fraud detection).

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Multimodel database with native graph capabilities is usually superior to relational JOINs for deep traversals.
C) Simple lookups by key, full-text search, or geographic queries.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Multimodel database often provides built-in support for these diverse query types in one engine.

4. What are your scalability requirements?

A) Predictable growth; we can scale vertically (bigger server) for the foreseeable future.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Relational database is often simpler to manage and performs excellently on a single powerful machine.
B) Need to scale horizontally across many machines to handle massive read/write volumes or data size.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Multimodel database (especially designed for distribution) is typically better suited for horizontal scaling.

5. What consistency guarantees do you need?

A) Strong consistency is non-negotiable (e.g., financial transactions, inventory counts).

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a traditional Relational database with full ACID compliance is the standard choice.
B) Eventual consistency is acceptable for better availability and partition tolerance (e.g., social media feeds, product reviews).

See explanation

If this sounds like you, many Multimodel databases offer tunable consistency (BASE model), providing flexibility.

6. What is your team's expertise?

A) Strong in SQL and relational data modeling.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, sticking with a Relational database might reduce learning curves and accelerate development.
B) Comfortable with multiple paradigms (document, graph, key-value) and willing to learn new query languages.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Multimodel database could unlock more potential without introducing multiple disparate systems.

7. What is your deployment and operational environment?

A) On-premises or single-cloud vendor with standard operational tools.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, Relational databases have mature, well-understood tooling for backup, monitoring, and management.
B) Multi-cloud, hybrid, or need a fully managed service that abstracts complexity.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, many cloud-native Multimodel databases are built as managed services with global distribution capabilities.

8. What is the long-term vision for your application?

A) A core system of record that will remain focused on transactional integrity.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Relational database is the time-tested foundation for systems of record.
B) An evolving platform that may incorporate real-time analytics, recommendation engines, or IoT data streams.

See explanation

If this sounds like you, a Multimodel database provides the flexibility to adopt new data models without a full database migration.

Quick Side-by-Side Overview

Aspect	Relational Database	Multimodel Database
Best For	Structured data, complex queries with joins, ACID transactions, stable schemas.	Varied data models (documents, graphs, key-value) in one system, flexible schemas, horizontal scaling.
Strengths	Data integrity, powerful SQL, mature ecosystem, strong consistency.	Flexibility, developer agility, horizontal scalability, ability to handle diverse data and queries.
Weaknesses	Vertical scaling limits, schema rigidity, less suited for unstructured data.	Potential complexity in query optimization across models, newer ecosystem, sometimes weaker consistency defaults.
Typical Use Cases	ERP, CRM, banking systems, e-commerce transactions.	Content management, real-time analytics, social networks, IoT platforms, catalogs with multiple views.

Note: This is a generalized comparison. Specific products and configurations can blur these lines.

Deep Interactive Comparison

a) What are these options?

A Relational Database (RDBMS) organizes data into tables (relations) of rows and columns. Relationships between tables are enforced by foreign keys. It uses SQL (Structured Query Language) for defining and manipulating data.

A Multimodel Database is a database system that supports multiple data models (like document, graph, key-value, column-family) within a single, integrated backend. It allows you to use the best model for each part of your data without running separate databases.

Check all that apply:

My data naturally fits into:

Tables with rows and columns
JSON-like documents
Networks of connected items (graphs)
Simple key-value pairs

If you checked only the first box, lean relational. If you checked two or more of the latter boxes, a multimodel database is worth exploring.

b) Why these options exist

Relational databases were created to solve data redundancy and integrity issues in early computing, using mathematical set theory. Multimodel databases emerged from the NoSQL movement to address the "one-size-fits-all" limitation, offering flexibility for modern polyglot applications.

Learn more about the trade-offs

The core trade-off is between consistency and flexibility. Relational databases prioritize consistency and structure, which optimizes for complex queries and integrity. Multimodel databases prioritize flexibility in data modeling and horizontal scaling, which optimizes for developer speed and handling diverse data at scale.

c) Strengths and weaknesses deep dive

Relational Strengths: Proven ACID transactions, rich SQL with joins and subqueries, extensive tooling (ORM, reporting), and deep community knowledge.

Relational Weaknesses: Scaling horizontally is complex (often requiring sharding), schema changes can be costly, and it's not ideal for hierarchical or graph-like data.

Multimodel Strengths: Single system to handle multiple data types, flexible schema, built-in horizontal scaling, and often designed for cloud-native deployment.

Multimodel Weaknesses: Query language may vary per model (though some offer unified language), transactional guarantees might be per-model, and operational patterns are less standardized.

Which of these matters most to you right now?

Guaranteed data consistency for every transaction
Ability to store and query data as a graph natively
Avoiding the complexity of managing multiple database systems

If the first is critical, relational is strong. If the latter two are important, consider multimodel.

d) Performance, scalability, and consistency

Relational: Optimized for high throughput on complex joins on a single node. Scales vertically effectively. Provides strong consistency by default. Horizontal scaling (sharding) is possible but adds significant operational complexity.

Multimodel: Designed for horizontal scaling from the ground up, distributing data across clusters. Performance is highly dependent on the data model used and query patterns. Offers tunable consistency (from strong to eventual) to balance latency and availability.

e) Ecosystem tools and support

Relational: Mature ecosystem: ORMs (Hibernate, Entity Framework), BI tools (Tableau, Power BI), backup solutions, and decades of DBA best practices. SQL is a universal skill.

Multimodel: Growing ecosystem, often with proprietary or extended query languages (e.g., AQL for ArangoDB, Gremlin for graph). Managed cloud services (Azure Cosmos DB, Amazon Neptune) reduce operational burden. Support communities are newer but active.

f) Common myths and mistakes

Myth: NoSQL/Multimodel is always faster than SQL.

Reality: Speed depends on the query and data model. For complex relational queries, a well-indexed RDBMS is often faster. Multimodel databases can be faster for specific operations like graph traversal or document retrieval.

Myth: SQL databases cannot scale.

Reality: They can scale vertically very high and horizontally with effort. New distributed SQL databases (like CockroachDB, Yugabyte) blend SQL and horizontal scaling.

Mistake: Using multiple models in a multimodel database without planning.

Just because you can use documents, graphs, and key-value doesn't mean you should mix them arbitrarily. Design which model fits each entity for clarity and performance.

g) Real-world examples

Relational Typical Workloads: Banking: recording transactions and account balances. E-commerce: processing orders, managing inventory. Reporting: generating monthly sales reports with complex aggregations.

Multimodel Typical Workloads: Social platform: storing user profiles (documents), friend connections (graph), and session data (key-value). IoT application: handling time-series metrics, device metadata (documents), and alert relationships (graph).

If your application resembles the social platform or IoT example, keep reading about multimodel options.

Consider how many different ways you need to query the same core data.

h) What to do if you choose each option

Starter Checklist for Relational:

Normalize your data to reduce redundancy.
Define primary and foreign keys explicitly.
Invest in indexing strategies for common query paths.
Plan for connection pooling and routine vacuum/optimize tasks.

Starter Checklist for Multimodel:

Map your data entities to the most appropriate model (document vs graph vs key-value).
Understand the consistency settings for your use case.
Design your distribution/sharding key carefully.
Leverate the unified query language if available to simplify code.

i) When combining or switching makes sense

Polyglot Persistence: It's common to use a relational database as the system of record and a multimodel (or specialized) database for specific features like search (Elasticsearch), caching (Redis), or graph analysis. This adds complexity but can be optimal.

Migration Path: Start with a relational database for simplicity and proof-of-concept. If you later need graph capabilities or massive scale, you might introduce a multimodel database alongside it, migrating specific functionalities gradually.

Example of a hybrid architecture

An e-commerce site uses PostgreSQL for user accounts and orders (relational), Redis for shopping cart session (key-value), and ArangoDB for product recommendations (using graph relations between products). This uses each database for its strengths.

Final Decision Guidance

Based on your goals and the trade-offs, here is a clear path forward:

Choose a Relational Database if…

Your data is inherently tabular and relationships are key.
You require full ACID compliance for transactions.
Your team's expertise and tooling are centered around SQL.
Your scaling needs can be met vertically for the next 3-5 years.

Choose a Multimodel Database if…

Your application uses a combination of document, graph, and key-value data naturally.
You need to scale horizontally across data centers or clouds.
You prioritize developer agility and schema flexibility.
You want to consolidate multiple specialized databases into one system.

Choose a Hybrid Approach if…

You have a clear "system of record" (relational) but need supplementary capabilities like real-time recommendations (graph) or full-text search.
You are migrating gradually and can tolerate the operational complexity of multiple data stores.

Final verdict: There is no universally best choice; the optimal database depends on your specific data patterns, query requirements, and operational constraints.

Final Checkpoint Quiz

Confirm your understanding with these quick questions.

1. True or False: A multimodel database always provides stronger consistency than a relational database.

Answer: False.

Explanation

Relational databases typically provide strong consistency by default. Multimodel databases often offer tunable consistency, which can be weaker (eventual) for higher availability.

2. Which database type is generally better suited for storing and querying highly interconnected data, like a social network?

A) Relational Database
B) Multimodel Database (using its graph model)

Answer: B) Multimodel Database (using its graph model).

Explanation

While relational databases can model relationships with JOINs, native graph models in multimodel databases are optimized for traversing deep connections efficiently.

3. If your primary requirement is to execute complex analytical queries with multi-table joins on stable data, which is a safer default choice?

Answer: Relational Database.

Explanation

SQL in relational databases is specifically designed for this purpose, with decades of query optimization for such workloads.

4. What is a key advantage of a multimodel database over using several separate single-model databases?

Answer: Reduced operational complexity and the ability to run cross-model queries in a single system.

Explanation

Managing one database is simpler than managing three (e.g., a document store, a graph DB, and a key-value store). Some multimodel databases allow queries that reference different models simultaneously.

5. When should you seriously consider a hybrid database architecture?

Answer: When no single database type optimally satisfies all your application's distinct data access patterns.

Explanation

Polyglot persistence, while complex, is justified when you need the best tool for each job—like using relational for transactions, a search engine for text, and a cache for speed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a multimodel database replace a relational database entirely?

It can in many cases, especially if it supports ACID transactions and SQL-like querying. However, for applications deeply reliant on complex SQL features, stored procedures, or a vast ecosystem of SQL tools, a relational database might still be preferable.

Is schema flexibility always an advantage?

Not always. Flexibility can lead to data quality issues if not managed. A rigid schema enforces structure and validation, which is beneficial for critical business data. Flexibility is an advantage when requirements change rapidly.

How do joins in a relational database compare to graph traversals in a multimodel database?

Joins are set-based operations on tables, excellent for merging related rows. Graph traversals navigate explicit relationships (edges) between entities (vertices), which is more efficient for deep, recursive queries like "friends of friends".

What indexing strategies differ between these types?

Relational databases use B-tree indexes primarily for range queries. Multimodel databases may use various indexes per model: inverted indexes for full-text in documents, edge indexes for graphs, and composite indexes for JSON fields.

How does sharding work in each?

In relational databases, sharding is often manual and application-led, splitting tables across instances. In multimodel databases, sharding is typically built-in and automatic, distributing data based on a shard key (like document ID or graph vertex ID).

What replication models are common?

Relational databases often use primary-replica replication for read scaling and failover. Multimodel databases frequently support multi-master replication for write availability across regions, with tunable consistency.

Can I have ACID transactions in a multimodel database?

Some multimodel databases offer ACID transactions, but often within a single document or a limited scope (e.g., a single collection). Cross-partition or cross-model ACID transactions are less common and may impact performance.

What is the operational complexity difference?

Relational databases have well-known operational procedures but can be complex to scale horizontally. Multimodel databases abstract some distribution complexities but introduce new concepts around consistency tuning and multi-model management.

OLTP vs OLAP: which database type is better for each?

Relational databases are traditionally strong for OLTP (Online Transaction Processing). Some multimodel databases can handle OLTP, especially for document workloads. For OLAP (Online Analytical Processing), specialized columnar stores (often separate) are best, though some multimodel databases include columnar options.

How do data warehouses and data lakes fit in?

Both relational and multimodel databases are typically used for operational workloads (OLTP). Data warehouses (relational-based, columnar) and data lakes (object storage) are for analytics and big data. A multimodel database might feed data into a warehouse or lake.

What about vector search for AI applications?

This is a specialized need. Neither traditional relational nor standard multimodel databases excel at vector similarity search. You'd typically use a dedicated vector database or a multimodel database that has added vector capabilities as an extension.

Is migration from relational to multimodel difficult?

It can be significant. It involves transforming tabular data into documents/graphs and rewriting queries. A phased approach, moving one module at a time, is recommended. Tools and connectors exist to help with data movement.

What are the cost implications?

Relational databases (especially open-source) can have lower licensing costs but may require expensive hardware for vertical scaling. Multimodel databases (often cloud services) have pricing based on throughput, storage, and global distribution, which can be more granular but unpredictable at scale.

Can I use SQL with a multimodel database?

Many multimodel databases offer SQL-like query languages or even full SQL support for their document models (e.g., SQL API in Azure Cosmos DB). However, for graph queries, a different language (like Gremlin or Cypher) is usually needed.

Menu

Relational database vs Multimodel database

AI Assistant

Was this tool helpful?